Delivery-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:27:18 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C066D1E0A2B
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F6F2F94E;
	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:27:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264672F848
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yEL_70cALl8p for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055A42F7EF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mbgax-1XG9MG1BsD-00J3Kw for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <53A30C94.1080506@gmx.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:15:16 -0500
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tor-Talk <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:r/dtaB4V8gysRS+XkL9EbJxibJs3NMPNaD8ISaoje0VOzs1LxOk
 ssRs4HWkmN1/yeKPa7AC2pV31tAjoncs/2HSdnZP4fqXGd/UH5SInbYuWI893F6PdFByAy+
 dtsQJhKQRr8vfZsnnp3R5Svgc5VGiRJYtCxpOciQ5fZdTFERvKtz6OXD1h2yUBzxGsKLHIb
 N551uqeBivr6/sYcG7KgQ==
Subject: [tor-talk] Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in
	TorBrowser?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Curious:  Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor Browser 
3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?

If so, why is that?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

