Delivery-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:26:49 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90D681E0A69
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:26:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52E72FF97;
	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234512FF0F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:23:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id T29p1nm315Ir for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:23:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04FB62FE45
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i13so8992049qae.33
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=DmFgDh2fJfCW8mZnCDJOLl80uftR6a/mN+lGp/OpCA0=;
 b=yOVCgdG5Py89RsCmjQuCqVUBrDeNNzIFoJPlY1Re6nNhwGESKzAPgdBtjfZkTl6Ls5
 Lhaz+W5O4D4kLFjFHAWI6eAEclA8+0PJWdyx2guD7ZHqsrvhY3lX+CV/He+4lvvSqU3D
 soNZ2mO8bAHpiYE7GvADxrhP58yqd21tVyRj2pkv/6hMUlNQVBIPSn1nDbji3ICvCiK5
 Ao2a+oNaswXaD+N2MsVeqSueAokjXNGIFue13MzfOwUCca+gEhC2j8KL89pszIBkpTcJ
 Oq0SDDUFka6FZskDfYGa1XwtY0bth/TdjHArn2OClorceJ/+Az9sW0Drv0n+ewbGu+Fx
 213w==
X-Received: by 10.224.80.137 with SMTP id t9mr12445009qak.100.1403000616537;
 Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.147.147 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?B?5Y2T5Lit5rWB?= <zhongliu.zhuo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:23:16 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFZL6jQ4F-QhoO_h4xXGOPd57QmNs4vTPYoGH5B2JbgQenVtEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Strange problmes when building Tor private network
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I really appreciate your help Nick, it helps a lot, now it seems the
consensus file is correct~
BTW, I Googled the proposal 161 but there was no section 8 ~
and one last thing, what does "Unmeasured =1  which is based on a threshold
of 3 or more measurements" mean in consensus file? Much obliged.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

