Delivery-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:56:39 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85EE1E0B9D
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5B02FC27;
	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:56:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4C92FC21
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id icSE-JgHC_1i for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC14F2FBE1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22AFF4F122
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir@fulvetta.riseup.net)
 with ESMTPSA id 31C0F3EA
Message-ID: <539A83EF.4040602@riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:54:07 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAD2Ti29i-Rh=80edAs2KQaufj-+5HoKp+mzCxKNsWkY2fRo7KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <53913B05.7000709@riseup.net>
 <CAD2Ti2-u-pKLOgvXhxrZL3P-0_Exxq5ahC4O5VQ+VnfzpBuqDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <539A7E01.3090803@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <539A7E01.3090803@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now giving Tor the slows, lol
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 06/12/2014 10:28 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/11/2014 08:38 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
>>> I've looked at four CL sites:
>>
>> Here the distribution of every exit with a matching
>> policy to one site, with its respective page time and
>> 'getinfo ns/id/fp' weight. Exits sorted by page time.
>>
>> http://bayimg.com/nAodGAaFL
>>
>> The first 170+ with 0 time tor refused as 'unrecognized
>> relays' even though policy permitted them. They might
>> have been sleeping.
>>
>> The division of half the relays is interesting.
>> If there's a better source for the probability each
>> exit will be picked by a client I'd like to know?
>>
>> As is the sizable number of weight dropouts
>> around the start of blocking near 120 sec.
> 
> Here's what I get for craigslist from my first test series. As noted, I
> get information about Tor exit used using exit_used.py[1] and loading
> times with "torsocks midori -s http://craigslist.org/". I got blacklist
> information for the exits from MXToolBox[2].
> 
> http://bayimg.com/kaOIOAafL

I missed a KB to Kbps error :(

Here:

http://bayimg.com/lAoiMAAfL

> For three of the ten exits used (default client choices) in the first
> test series, http://craigslist.org/ loaded in about eight seconds (30-50
> Kbps). For the other seven, it took several minutes (~1 Kbps).
> 
> I don't see any obvious correlation with blacklist status.
> 
> [1] https://stem.torproject.org/tutorials/examples/exit_used.html
> [2] http://mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

