Delivery-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:41:40 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by moria.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A921E0AC3
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EDB2FBBA;
	Thu, 12 Jun 2014 02:41:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CB72F53F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 02:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 1PUBKerHXR3w for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 02:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684CA2F457
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 02:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id db11so1170688veb.12
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=mOxioKPdQprRC5mOTCfYnN7djgLZ9GHFruGE/oen4Sc=;
 b=ZPNL4SbUyyNL3NsBlslEZ6+7pJk10RRT5+pUUY8VRjiDReRqCjvVuf7erJ8uFoWxm5
 PHLt8G64ioBC32rcKp6bvv3F6xZCaCFXspgbFHCohdRY8w/UF5FPUH9fML0DBr+QJZSy
 TJc1U+ufw4EdoZwEVjGpzO6z2/kOpFl5XRMsS5ruHH9o3lRh11IqmcnqOsnhx6h005ly
 fp+PitOtnRbpwerrpNekYmDgviDnQzA6o8/NTS5NG+gqewcVgO/5cZrckee3Os5+4Gcp
 OLaMtOTxpsO85ugMxo0uq/UP5z8A6opV0K7ajk70P6yWu1ISowUu0qGcOXruAtwObHcQ
 O52Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.211.133 with SMTP id nc5mr8932521vec.28.1402540735681;
 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.65.198 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53913B05.7000709@riseup.net>
References: <CAD2Ti29i-Rh=80edAs2KQaufj-+5HoKp+mzCxKNsWkY2fRo7KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <53913B05.7000709@riseup.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:38:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2-u-pKLOgvXhxrZL3P-0_Exxq5ahC4O5VQ+VnfzpBuqDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now giving Tor the slows, lol
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
> I've looked at four CL sites:

Here the distribution of every exit with a matching
policy to one site, with its respective page time and
'getinfo ns/id/fp' weight. Exits sorted by page time.

http://bayimg.com/nAodGAaFL

The first 170+ with 0 time tor refused as 'unrecognized
relays' even though policy permitted them. They might
have been sleeping.

The division of half the relays is interesting.
If there's a better source for the probability each
exit will be picked by a client I'd like to know?

As is the sizable number of weight dropouts
around the start of blocking near 120 sec.

> In the course of each test set, I saw connections through the initial
> exit to 100-130 other CL sites. I also saw numerous connections to other
> CL sites through many other exits.
>
> I don't know how to interpret that. Any ideas?

CL DNS load balancing moving IP's, your html agent fetching
embedded urls.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

