Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:27:27 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94ED01E06FA;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E03936D15;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:27:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA9C36D0F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Ei8hNHltvkmg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF7336BB7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:27:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgov12 with SMTP id v12so73164306wgo.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
 :subject:to:content-type;
 bh=zjXzrcO6YcRCGiNWdVerTqCMpy3UfwZqcaZIvm8jR8E=;
 b=DZLhpORqW99KsTW1a4/pJdaWuSiR5t5v7LEhRMx2oPPg6FCII+wDqLSECQIajfBBtR
 JVsDjMa3oBTf5YWBdAIMrri1So/gBhoNdPHR/Apu5pg1q3smufGeJmhJNXuuxovtF8CB
 eAAQQRNZ1h5YaDV14pLprVWpHkImsBGZMurxo0ylB07jgSkBWmtX5ubReZKZRTG02+m3
 tOUCozXip9Os11x+k0kcu1VxhhEX4EGOhzSytcFDqKevzXnSrwZRkOKHZnMbTpmo+a7T
 0greMKMjDgySdGyasBlpyYaLER93DAgqLSTHdDPiXJy/HTq9fBJu5XqOUtWxO+GiYAQq
 /3nw==
X-Received: by 10.180.160.210 with SMTP id xm18mr1011938wib.93.1436560032045; 
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.178.80 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55A029DD.2070301@riseup.net>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55A01F25.1010002@tvdw.eu>
 <CAEf4M_CNKETg_5cXv03JtgZ_HkyxfFP5M+1s+U0R3FigZXLcgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55A029DD.2070301@riseup.net>
From: z9wahqvh <z9wahqvh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:26:42 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5JCUr9A0U8YZRlSOUUvf_iD8Oz0
Message-ID: <CAJoS0DWDP=bJJugG7Z624ua9jZGbYpXtJ_PrBAGosVXQW9_tHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

far be it for me to agree with Juan, but "amoral" is usually taken to mean
"without regard for or understanding of morality": a geeky example would be
Galactus, who devours entire worlds without any real knowledge of who lives
on them, whether they are "good" or "bad," etc. he hungers, he needs to
eat. predator animals can be viewed this way too: the lion doesn't get to
decide to become a vegetarian. "nature" writ large is amoral.

I believe the word you are looking for is "immoral," "doing something you
know is wrong [or even just illegal] & doing it anyway"

one might argue (people do on this list frequently) that Tor itself is
"amoral" (exists without regard to morality), but the uses you and your
friend are concerned about are what is usually called "immoral" (I am not
saying this is true or not true, just talking about word meaning here.)

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:

>         ps : 'amoral' is not the right word for things that fucked up
>         conservatives dislike.
>
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

