Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:10:57 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884781E03C8;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:10:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21A136D00;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:10:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F1736CFB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ggV2zB4KK-tc for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B873336CF8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgef3 with SMTP id f3so84560879qge.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=hP+cpyKu1Yqsfaij7PrTDaGm/0wnj1FP5OEuC810QKI=;
 b=d8lxl3ub6PWLLK7B/qOpe+/ruWCLdyLFe2wTETXyDZLIHxkYbfGu09FEXVIxkR2Oa7
 ldjwwKaC3gen1KICmFRFWOOzdsGy7PK3hbq4C3OmXzUXWuBbr3Pdmm1S/L+ZEGOAm8v7
 iCC41a8FCXfAnFXjMPiWhTvslcTXuIqi66VxDbRmUMZ17rjFn+rBBPk15UJVyO/1mVjf
 VcUwl7lBaDYVAdNyo00l82wGHmTVnemTKX6xTI0s8t/ld3PxpM6X4WLSrFsSBq8Uno5M
 Oh7rwsP0UTLJAtipjyT+9dYuOs2SJCO42TSizNUC8eUx2kEzTAImc6KaPNEq12/EX/8s
 zc+w==
X-Received: by 10.140.236.147 with SMTP id h141mr37544343qhc.77.1436559042282; 
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (host12.200-82-64.telecom.net.ar. [200.82.64.12])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v64sm6377928qgv.28.2015.07.10.13.10.41
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55a026c1.c6278c0a.9fd9a.fffff8e6@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:11:16 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500
Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
> Tor relays.  I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
> 
> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
> portion of the exit node traffic".  I believe by "amoral" he meant
> sexual exploitation.


	You mean porn? Yes, a lot of tor traffic is prolly porn.
	But, amoral? 

	No. What is morally fucked up or 'morally bad' if you prefer, is
	the use of tor as a propaganda tool for the US government. And
	that's what tor really is. 

	The fact that tor is used to view porn is the only good thing
	about it. 


	ps : 'amoral' is not the right word for things that fucked up
	conservatives dislike. 



>  The conversation was sparked by my complaint
> that the new show "Mr. Robot" couldn't resist introducing Tor in the
> same breath as child porn.
> 
> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
> would like to find data to support my belief.  Anyone know of such
> research or statistics?
> 
> Thanks!
> Drew
> https://keybase.io/pdp7

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

