Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:45:17 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671BF1E06C3;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AE236CF8;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:45:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BBA36CE0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yUlwL_fn4c3G for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C11036CDD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykee186 with SMTP id e186so71335708yke.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=sW2KALdzYnfLO5gbuErgam4DMW7auVpYDvdcRMLlNGU=;
 b=okrA0WQcQFkqsjfH18T4CAvSrBEQkGBc4HRY8mlOI1bW8hleZqLcMRt4UJpbzTrGMa
 E4EZVJMYE2haUbU0514v6VjG68hHM+zzRenB61GoVOu6VZd9DaspyAYJ+F8K3gTtTaU+
 wfkhYPU8TAm8kT6PdpZzm9jSMfcANaxvrfl5oeZ9ty3ub5lqv5I9kGZARLGRIv7v50jZ
 IPOL/hUCJyflJwKjUYyoSwG2oxfC0XU8Jn9LHs1bzZRSDPWSb6crSh9UTnzMfklFioOu
 h7g5YyMvBiJZOBZ79hEZ2Sw1EiIl9XhkOLycuDS+lG0bGl/hFqJ0RhwJaU9aw00LSDyj
 tMAw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.111.65 with SMTP id k62mr25961203ywc.88.1436557503808;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.252.7 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55A01F25.1010002@tvdw.eu>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55A01F25.1010002@tvdw.eu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:45:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEf4M_CNKETg_5cXv03JtgZ_HkyxfFP5M+1s+U0R3FigZXLcgA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Good point - let me rephrase:

I believe I've seen Roger and Jacob refute such claims that Tor
traffic is all illegal activities, and I believe I've read posts in
support of that.  Unfortunately, I'm having trouble finding the
appropriate links at the moment.

I'd like to be able to say: the majority of Tor usage is positive for
humanity and here's why...

thanks,
drew

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom van der Woerdt <info@tvdw.eu> wrote:
> Drew Fustini schreef op 10/07/15 om 21:35:
>
>> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
>> Tor relays.  I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
>>
>> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
>> portion of the exit node traffic".  I believe by "amoral" he meant
>> sexual exploitation.  The conversation was sparked by my complaint
>> that the new show "Mr. Robot" couldn't resist introducing Tor in the
>> same breath as child porn.
>>
>> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
>> would like to find data to support my belief.  Anyone know of such
>> research or statistics?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Drew
>> https://keybase.io/pdp7
>>
>
> Doing such research, where one would be snooping on Tor users' traffic and
> most likely without their consent, would be "amoral".
>
> Tom
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

