Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:35:20 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0191E030B;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439E636CEB;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:35:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9BC36CE0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id bpX48XAAZ2r0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x236.google.com (mail-yk0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A074236CDD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykax123 with SMTP id x123so23708795yka.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=yI2s2mPKnpi/zPXZHVL36HYXOa5I82+KF5voTnvxm0c=;
 b=aOKNAoWjC8q8v1j/DGTnvgn0nTKn8z+d7DuIga/dgHqHVZV5uRPTUwZXaRNN4iBcS5
 eJN+fx40nm4AsDbZBbJQpS1TWBNbTFqSFjiG1ea0b5UKB6u4RcNVDYJT25K8mbuH7Xg/
 c04NXYgL228FMvzezxO40ZqecHcgh0KiTvaRcmvN9o3j3ngRFW/9+M0CeaN1oOA7JqqW
 eFIQBMjNCAPELfoNqK+do6JP+tJO6esjWXx/rsMT34DOwOTo0bRNRW0ixsbzI/fOdFYv
 ztnkMlwxbu2YVSlWfaBGmiUhJAzZY16P2DDlaMGznDkhYe7xkLEU1H8bcvzPIAxPTBnm
 yttQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.133.198 with SMTP id z189mr25130119ykb.41.1436556904333; 
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.252.7 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
Tor relays.  I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.

An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
portion of the exit node traffic".  I believe by "amoral" he meant
sexual exploitation.  The conversation was sparked by my complaint
that the new show "Mr. Robot" couldn't resist introducing Tor in the
same breath as child porn.

I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
would like to find data to support my belief.  Anyone know of such
research or statistics?

Thanks!
Drew
https://keybase.io/pdp7
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

