Delivery-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:09:28 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0124D1E04C4;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:09:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D9A3494B;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E27134306
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id B-hye3PmO_4G for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F27033ED2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org;
 s=mail2; 
 h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date;
 bh=5ViMTyUe0XFov4ZdzKgQL8T+1YZ6JqCUNL9DoM53e5k=; 
 b=rzXXedSoME0duBPzQJunEhvyYCipJzljNk/fNuDEk9XNSnixA7ZvqlSWjAfr7S/jp14Lg8z1MfpfHNNeWF/LNXPzol8By60LTvPctgf2UyqDDlbG573AcE0wa5kxniukbj+/X1icouyCxRknWBQmS6b9PdjAzNOpBLEzITc/SKk=;
Received: ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:09:16 -0700
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:09:16 -0700
From: Seth David Schoen <schoen@eff.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20150728170915.GJ8285@mail2.eff.org>
References: <42F7FACCAE6E46E68668AA08F2D563D9@aaozsfay9x65t4>
 <55B6832A.4050307@riseup.net>
 <AD264DB0BC34445D819FC300BA8BE880@aaozsfay9x65t4>
 <55B693FD.6070904@riseup.net>
 <D18C816565214041B521E7BDC33FB0CD@aaozsfay9x65t4>
 <55B6CBCE.6050704@riseup.net>
 <CA+6V+xDabg6Yw9tAb2O-Tpz7J6V1xQdgLU6ev9wPf1e_rz2fqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8DAA9F08B77E450FA0201986AE47008B@aaozsfay9x65t4>
 <55B7A1CB.90209@riseup.net>
 <A4F73725441B40769A89A67E61FF45EF@aaozsfay9x65t4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A4F73725441B40769A89A67E61FF45EF@aaozsfay9x65t4>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] tor not running
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Bill Cunningham writes:

> #3 and on I did not know. Never usesd "Keys". But I have the gp44win know. I will let you know the results. After having "imported the keychain" If that's the correct wording. How does this download site work for others and not me? I am showing my ignorance I know, but I don't know why.

Most users don't use GPG to verify their downloads -- probably much
fewer than 1%.  If the download succeeds without interference, it isn't
technically necessary to verify it before using it.  It's a security
precaution.

-- 
Seth Schoen  <schoen@eff.org>
Senior Staff Technologist                       https://www.eff.org/
Electronic Frontier Foundation                  https://www.eff.org/join
815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA  94109       +1 415 436 9333 x107
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

