Delivery-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:36:30 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BF61E034C;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB48536AC9;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0301336893
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:36:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id eobwkyIvsEat for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B008A3680B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so162336610wic.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=766VPGreBqx1AsWcsdnThZ6ttZNbqFV97st1MCkpqDs=;
 b=oL+vsLBNGS1u2Gt6Qk2WrkJ97nJyOt4fHYr55JZs2dm39XmAfUAqOO4AChE6KrWxSS
 Y6Bq7ufyJbnJbPPQJqr3dqZTc1P/FHvTFYxrmjyOz7gjB6rF/zIXnIE0+nRS8l72fUMe
 byAfoktEZlDSCXdtP8RulBhfBMPVGPJhNtejva00yJ2rBFUDUqzPEk0PRmoBAvJ/IL8L
 +2+Bsn6YOrRWa2ocEjFuX0W/bj7mH+tEJWgR7nwdqlztLFgR9vmYRov7Enm/jebfo0IH
 w/7Usyg8wU/X3vKx7QTjUB0HHhCKYQhcdpa8Zv8owfw7l41aljnVu/fQeqpv67ZbTxho
 2qOw==
X-Received: by 10.194.192.166 with SMTP id hh6mr64340381wjc.127.1438097776844; 
 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.41.91] (195-154-136-40.rev.poneytelecom.eu.
 [195.154.136.40])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm33843686wjr.18.2015.07.28.08.36.15
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: aka <akademiker1@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: aka <akademiker1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55B7A168.8010608@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:36:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20150722233616.GY15647@mail2.eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150722233616.GY15647@mail2.eff.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] HORNET onion routing design
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Atm CPU is the bottleneck as Tor routers can't keep up with path lookups
crypto. Padding messages to consume more unused bandwidth to make
netflow correlation attacks more difficult makes sense.

Seth David Schoen wrote:
> Has anybody looked at the new HORNET system?
> 
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05724v1
> 
> It's a new onion routing design that seems to call for participation
> by clients, servers, and network-layer routers; in exchange it claims
> extremely good performance and scalability results.
> 
> I think it also calls for the use of network-layer features that aren't
> present in today's Internet, so it might be hard to get a practical
> deployment up and running at the moment.
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

