Delivery-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:41:12 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D2C1E01A6;
	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BEA378B8;
	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E4237749
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id uSdAMUv2lIIw for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96777370F7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5435920C87
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:40:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=veryspeedy.net; h=
 content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
 :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=eEnxgehep0HFeYW2DIxklWmKxE4=; b=vpaKlQ
 zsPioRsRe/jrGPj5V6Pi7YXfoo763Xk+HUhFl7cH5+9EbLRQdK6LMoO2dyieRnFI
 BV4b7QCjAb5EpRYcGEi5AyKMAqBXRfzja0dKVFPo7DUdYcEvMcIPbpRGgJYnBiPI
 mRUDrmDRjKgQeEIh3fQuw+TyeHUspKkcIvSsk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=eEnxgehep0HFeYW
 2DIxklWmKxE4=; b=XeJAXHnTKnSVJnGs1ItPVGCMk65Xg4ZeOG8PIb0VFVLDN0L
 /8olpSUZqX7S+/YCj3wD8kVeBCzHJt9djSYpJ/BYM/2rtoYNibwF3YfQMMVYEumQ
 CXvLu109L+qDHaYXRKbYIu/VW8jjpBL8oOzc+AKPYMO4W9yBcszb7My56/3M=
X-Sasl-enc: 5iD61dnZMj5sV+Zxo/1R3IjhAkiiNXtz7jvMnSkv+IyF 1436949657
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [5.199.164.108])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B3E55C00022
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:40:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALogXGX=w_hrtCO35_k4nt=7YqfYPyK0K_PFHAYgNuOX_K6e+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lara <lara.tor@emails.veryspeedy.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55A61C97.1050208@emails.veryspeedy.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:40:55 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALogXGX=w_hrtCO35_k4nt=7YqfYPyK0K_PFHAYgNuOX_K6e+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Mansour Moufid:
> Is bad traffic overrepresented or is good traffic underrepresented?

Mansour, the above is an useless proposition. Meaning "Is it A or is it A?"

> Bad actors are bound to be early adopters of any technology.  As the
> network becomes mainstream, its content will reflect the users.  With
> time things should improve.

Bad actors take Razzie Awards.

Else, yes, that is most probably going to happen. It happened back when
Windows '95 hit the shelves too. I can imagine when socially inept will
meet online once again and suffer for "the good old days" when decent
pedophiles roamed and not the biberites of those dark dark days.

Cheers!

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

