Delivery-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:45:23 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97331E04FC;
	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:45:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9326537C52;
	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8837C50
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sVByRsejccup for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9B937C4F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagx9 with SMTP id x9so15999686lag.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=wOw6h2hDLMTgxJBKzw3eYI+/L9rXwbh8fg0ugZWefCQ=;
 b=V9yeC5cSfJTVvLr5Cero7Qkix0K3NBhy/jAF4AmVpionRrtLLQJzN17NfbaXSqheyL
 BbrWZQaCsD3ZDF1DbmI++CsntiX/7IYZzpp8EnnQNpGfEl28kP5Pkhr8lHp1hgSjhr11
 x/8B4HfBZ5ABqHRTjbNJY1sWbYYPU4od1vLjaPFGeiON+XOB5MwB9A5g/iq4q46F5lJ+
 Ve+aQn7iszgWQMz1LmLIkUPjwv8/QfjE2HANx6x19x8dPb25R7wSQRXc2s/Yw0J0OLO0
 Brb0n7Aai4XawFpLk2jD/KGNAJU9gE2QWTZ8i9GzQVSvhxrMXsECNKNGQfARDr1LPjXs
 7eHA==
X-Received: by 10.153.5.11 with SMTP id ci11mr1589521lad.14.1436924709405;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.97 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mansour Moufid <mansourmoufid@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:44:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CALogXGX=w_hrtCO35_k4nt=7YqfYPyK0K_PFHAYgNuOX_K6e+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
> Tor relays.  I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
>
> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
> portion of the exit node traffic".  I believe by "amoral" he meant
> sexual exploitation.  The conversation was sparked by my complaint
> that the new show "Mr. Robot" couldn't resist introducing Tor in the
> same breath as child porn.
>
> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
> would like to find data to support my belief.  Anyone know of such
> research or statistics?
>
> Thanks!
> Drew
> https://keybase.io/pdp7

Is bad traffic overrepresented or is good traffic underrepresented?

Bad actors are bound to be early adopters of any technology.  As the
network becomes mainstream, its content will reflect the users.  With
time things should improve.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

