Delivery-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:56:43 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930C31E08BE;
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BC337605;
	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D4F375F3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id J3tbSYiO67i5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4057737589
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oibn4 with SMTP id n4so15824938oib.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=M5d42j8iFr1DWKjYdykdPHGLMZeVcyPuRxN9It1ZV7A=;
 b=OzIqZffB4FRJRoPu0NYBlcJ30Lu3gTnmA2lX9fzpvK0YvJNjWfx5AZa1UMAOSG+gDr
 8t/SLPF7fWGiqQ8Pm0d0baZbwyb6j/i6ExzKYp1SfTcNethmBoNxc0+CbY9nLX6vQZA1
 5PFipiSkM4Ct75rxUpPKnVm9O+vEbkYL+cGO8EQRLXnk3FdlY5eYQhdQ+hed/kX3OKkX
 akzYepDr4tjMNferHIcXtkjX//fUezFdd+O0c1ofI0v0WeGP93eZwapzOxeTfifvwuMH
 tjvbk3fS9ytClHvpAYJSC5otVkd+V+VDJw/Snob3frtVuLO9AcsOnQv0fE9bw+SpqUGU
 JTqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.198.138 with SMTP id w132mr27952866oif.72.1436763391038; 
 Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.121.202 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55a026c1.c6278c0a.9fd9a.fffff8e6@mx.google.com>
References: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55a026c1.c6278c0a.9fd9a.fffff8e6@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:56:30 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: r7qiQ4Kx2Enh8oxZIWRbfe9UDyI
Message-ID: <CAOsGNSSCyfxGhJNCRsGnqr6s46L=bbuPQLEv6mZgbHxXXzzyLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 7/10/15, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500
> Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple
>> Tor relays.  I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission.
>>
>> An online friend recently claimed to me that "amoral content is a huge
>> portion of the exit node traffic".  I believe by "amoral" he meant
>> sexual exploitation.
>
>
> 	You mean porn? Yes, a lot of tor traffic is prolly porn.
> 	But, amoral?
>
> 	No. What is morally fucked up or 'morally bad' if you prefer, is
> 	the use of tor as a propaganda tool for the US government. And
> 	that's what tor really is.
>
> 	The fact that tor is used to view porn is the only good thing
> 	about it.
>
>
> 	ps : 'amoral' is not the right word for things that fucked up
> 	conservatives dislike.

Come on Juan! Grow the f*** up already and apply for Executive
Director of TorProject, then we can all finally feel protected, safe,
secure and private when using TBB!

Really, it's fence-sitting amoral positions like yours that really get
my chicken going... fix the world already,
Zenaan
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

