Delivery-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:49:47 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD2491E0CA8;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE5536D7A;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:49:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F92F36D78
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id A1MPdaodv1cF for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from WM50.inbox.com (wm50.inbox.com [64.135.83.50])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AC1A36D6E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from inbox.com (127.0.0.1:25)
 by inbox.com with [InBox.Com SMTP Server]
 id <1507101449032.WM50> for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org> from
 <beatthebastards@inbox.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:49:30 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type;
 b=gNQw6OW+Qtg0TvcV6WVWqOr5ENovdV7GsZmKJlcV2QFUJd/4wNSS1tCKGr+CkUt779bR
 OvaLMb6jXd+RnUwOMOnOisLjSBu/BOyDQPKcGL5sVE1RD82TR4ca3dpppJ1wPiTbUTh9yw
 MbRsREbewrxncTGMeiNC4dl+Ju6vVLZvA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=83/uPFuWL+gzWTvc+ICOHGf8UjvB5lfWz13yzcj2z5A=;
 b=ZedMb25GESh1XOtQmGWT9TNza3ykDbbCmVkyD2iDSw4Fe03CvXEEKH5UnDZQWyHWw2RO
 BMK7nNJCcABlaxvOqdt9sQjKUizGP0YLrQRxEBmwcLE1CPu+OS/XGJXnirAq6K0OWdR5a0
 pDksOpb98n+kjyQ4U70GPwBjDsdHJipNI=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:49:29 -0800
Message-ID: <936C216C481.000008CCbeatthebastards@inbox.com>
From: I <beatthebastards@inbox.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4M_B7o1k3JGFaqDJUSJnAoLLvW+fgj-OM_zWc21K92VLnaA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: INBOX.COM
X-Originating-IP: 115.64.30.59
X-IWM-ACU: f1Xn8IY-pCzN1MiIpNiVLDdLh_T81wZVoInKICFw8gzfqG_WWBVtEXs4nOv-
 2jE4lVj9D3LGMmcPQlxKa3cbJeq8w1vswSoKHouRdRcHdhoxFrtch_tavEsg
 _EuxGq2IFRv50faE151d0tCD6
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

One reasonable deduction might be that the proportion of the population which likes child porn would be the proportion or less of those using Tor for that.
That would be a pretty small number wouldn't it?

Robert

> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
> would like to find data to support my belief.  Anyone know of such
> research or statistics?
> 
> Thanks!
> Drew


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

