Delivery-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:58:34 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467CF1E0805;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAD730A3F;
	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A6E309D8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hsJhOE_GpzDE for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB9030542
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k48so2939702wev.41
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=ffT2DArEIU8MZLMGp988Y76kH0fejk4apgxNreyabJ4=;
 b=g5TzZ9rXvvAFXj9saKNZOyPHY+OsgNxgBBCNZ0g5PeKaoPMQHk4mszG1Gddfjpg3/6
 qJg/w8ANYcuguDZhWcKztHWJIvDgiezy0QyCtv0xGa+/8Xz2HwOVo9m5Dv6OxNwK/DL6
 PoPBp0io+j1kS8yomTinQIjcCV1UJcmbPVgbLKuZRJ94bKuq8tsFdqQNYqVWA52/PmMQ
 uvwGt0fHnoC/ZAvv5+eQFpWo8A3jgUHOU4JOS6AWRAJaIiYH+U/kfFnH3pRx28W9WGYJ
 +yECv5hNhUBskZBFMCcYeedRvBV0QXe/lCut3T0dOly8WPBTgmFd8KJjO5O7bemwnkr+
 CSSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.38.51 with SMTP id d19mr16825338wik.10.1406818700958;
 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.187.16 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53da2c02.4bf.4fc2d700.71f0a187@t-3.net>
References: <53da2c02.4bf.4fc2d700.71f0a187@t-3.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:58:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKkunMbDmLs_zoLVODjjg-Ngsqtw71t5XXf=SR5Qyh=kMfR3TA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

And since it's not possible to do this right without any leaks due to
software bugs, planted flaws and insiders, the only thing it will lead
to is to make it impossible for the users to verify the decisions
leading up to which servers are bad. The NSA will still get your
precious warnings.

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:44 PM,  <tor@t-3.net> wrote:
> Actually...
>
> A bad-relays mailing list would IMO take a degree of care to do right,
> considering that email gets gathered at the packet level by intelligence
> agencies who are expected to be initiating attacks. Sensitive stuff would
> belong as GPG or PGP emails or similar. Juicy details regarding bad-relays
> discussion should be tighter than even a closed mailing list, is my thought.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

