Delivery-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:58:10 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0C01E06FE
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41322F716;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:58:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AEE2F9C6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NmTEsJ6c2r3p for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.anonymail.us (unknown [162.243.112.143])
 (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A242F795
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (anonymail.us [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.anonymail.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABE71017E7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:52:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anonymail.us
Received: from mail.anonymail.us ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.anonymail.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yeY5iLk5ZynK for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:52:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from anonymail.us (anonymail.us [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.anonymail.us (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A4581016D3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:32:21 -0500
From: Cypher <cypher@cpunk.us>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <53D03FC2.4080904@bitmessage.ch>
References: <53CF9943.1060403@openmailbox.org>
 <57a5e150-b146-47ca-bd51-dcd2f04eec35@email.android.com>
 <53CFA997.7040008@openmailbox.org> <53D03FC2.4080904@bitmessage.ch>
Message-ID: <9cf7d36df70b7ec6b7cf4c327cd44f04@cajuntechie.org>
X-Sender: cypher@cpunk.us
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or
 is) funded by the US government
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2014-07-23 18:05, Tempest wrote:
> Kristy Chambers:
>> Have I written, that there is anything creepy about that?
>> The basic question is, in how the tor project can be trusted if we 
>> look
>> on suspicious activities of tor developers (e.g. choosing worse design
>> decisions).
> 
> the fundamental logical fallacy that one has to accept in order for the
> article to raise alarm is that everything the us government agencies do
> that are mentioned is evil. for how large the us government is, in
> particular the agencies mentioned, reaching such a conclusion should be
> treated with a high degree of skepticism.

Not only that, but it should be noted that there is a case for the 
government making something so strong that even they can't break it: 
China and a few other countries. They are working on breaking Tor too 
and, if the US can do it, it is just a matter of time before China will 
be able to.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

