Delivery-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:28:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE291E0500
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:28:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40352FB93;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A21E2F8B2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:27:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9CZpQhCyYdhD for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:27:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bitmessage.ch (mail.bitmessage.ch [146.228.112.252])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F6392F890
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail;
 c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 bh=G4jbX+bvxOOI/w1xQO18eh/CEX9WYnvbayzcdhDZk7M=;
 b=rZJOReMtjC7nCyYJnNM2mTXvX4QZ36Yea4sJbGoqmD/7bN+IEaddNATrrxHXs1vIFcPPer9ZxGH2YrjyzMzbPg0wXj1QOCCQwNUa/grqGERiWskK/7JS3j5pLLmZ3EglueITGb1+JrrpGRZSpFuR2AVlAuWb3bJY/zd9SBNQIGs=
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (BITMESSAGE [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitmessage.ch
 ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:27:21 +0200
Message-ID: <53D028D0.4090600@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:27:44 +0000
From: Nusenu <BM-2D8wMEVgGVY76je1WXNPfo8SrpZt5yGHES@bitmessage.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tor-Talk <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: [tor-talk] apt-transport-tor,
 hidden service usage to reduce exit load? exit enclaves dead?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

There is a new debian package that allows debian user to easily use apt
with tor.

https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt-transport-tor


I was wondering if it makes sense to use hidden service addresses to
access apt mirrors instead of going through an exit to reduce the load
on exit relays?

Is the concept of exit enclaves actually dead or would that also make
sense in this setup?
Is this website up to date?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ExitEnclave

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

