Delivery-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:27:08 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D431E0351
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:27:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF2C2FAEE;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFED2F795
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id QHmKx3KsmzHF for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:18:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.potager.org (quatre.potager.org [91.194.60.100])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.potager.org",
 Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19992F13A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:18:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTPSA id 8C276C2B7EB
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:18:42 +0200
From: Lunar <lunar@torproject.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20140716121842.GA6184@loar>
Mail-Followup-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <53C5231A.3090105@bitmessage.ch>
 <CAD2Ti297Zb7eY0WKCLyCFP8RdYrJvH=Fk8nCnxrOXhsduNcMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140715192530.GA28436@ix.home> <53C65187.1020806@bitmessage.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53C65187.1020806@bitmessage.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] GnuPG and Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5296004462550866689=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


--===============5296004462550866689==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf"
Content-Disposition: inline


--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Red Sonja:
> Rejo Zenger:
> > ++ 15/07/14 14:09 -0400 - grarpamp:
> >>> secured server. Or anybody can see your whole addressbook. So it is a
> >>> secured server. But still, it is quite obvious who am I just by looki=
ng
> >>> at that list. So I figured out, maybe if I push the refresh through T=
or,
> >>> talking with a secured server that would make things more private. I
> >>
> >> And unless one by one with --recv-keys, keyserver sees your
> >> entire list at once.
> >=20
> > Which means: the only thing you are protecting (by using Tor when=20
> > updating your keychain) is the source IP-address for the refresh, e.g.=
=20
> > your location.=20
>=20
> So the whole GnuPG is antithetical to anonymity?

If you use public key cryptography, we can say yes. That's why we
often differenciate between anonymity and pseudonymity. With GnuPG, one
can create a strong pseudonymous identity. Using Tor while using this
identity will make it harder to link it with other identities.

--=20
Lunar                                             <lunar@torproject.org>

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=k/La
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--

--===============5296004462550866689==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============5296004462550866689==--

