Delivery-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:42:01 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8D51E0AE0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:41:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB7E2F9DF;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:41:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FA02F94B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id aTXvtHLKwEok for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665172F73D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wp18so720543obc.6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 03:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=XQyMC4N9U6QkGCVvAunFx2FjMqvikDF0NtUpoeCbNDs=;
 b=e132tj5Sf6xLzftotK3Gii2tg5hnvUG+z4bXHRvSze2CDcbvfkFubQIn1JzD8ydSU0
 8Ps6KIFaCM8bqFZHWyt/JGVfPy6mrs+9mtjnbvhgZICM+rowRfkOnxl1agEsoYXqcldE
 i2isH3sIpRNMB0XV8OfV3dYY05hdm2KO2whH2WmoLRsyr31zQ+gt7b3uVVGWpS0mi9dA
 JmgRZ/+R+9xH/9l9Hv7/VrN8odx71Ov9wLGSlP8YfQCtiqxORwr5uUsIof0jE1NqSu3b
 q1UA/QU6LcDWzoEzlyuWS75KxrKePUwqV1c/LdUBBx4ZW/9kQvJIdnJ6oM0DsBiNfSOZ
 MYpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.89.164 with SMTP id bp4mr34291176obb.21.1405507183904;
 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.20.114 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53C65187.1020806@bitmessage.ch>
References: <53C5231A.3090105@bitmessage.ch>
 <CAD2Ti297Zb7eY0WKCLyCFP8RdYrJvH=Fk8nCnxrOXhsduNcMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140715192530.GA28436@ix.home> <53C65187.1020806@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:39:43 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yhZ0oLAT2Z1LRvXQOdEKqt1CjZ0
Message-ID: <CAOsGNSQUmx5soT0a9d8vV9ge8T0ovJqAu94Zn0M6dGmFU=siEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] GnuPG and Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 7/16/14, Red Sonja
<BM-2cTpEdTADjx2bQf6WuuX1CPER78Sq3xL76@bitmessage.ch> wrote:
> Rejo Zenger:
>> ++ 15/07/14 14:09 -0400 - grarpamp:
>>>> secured server. Or anybody can see your whole addressbook. So it is a
>>>> secured server. But still, it is quite obvious who am I just by looking
>>>> at that list. So I figured out, maybe if I push the refresh through
>>>> Tor,
>>>> talking with a secured server that would make things more private. I
>>>
>>> And unless one by one with --recv-keys, keyserver sees your
>>> entire list at once.
>>
>> Which means: the only thing you are protecting (by using Tor when
>> updating your keychain) is the source IP-address for the refresh, e.g.
>> your location.
>
> So the whole GnuPG is antithetical to anonymity?

Not the whole. It depends how you use it.

There are tools for secure key exchange, persistence of cryptographic
identity, connection of cryptographic identity to real identity,
identity verification, message privacy, message verification and more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GnuPG

All tools can be used in wrong ways.

You must know how to use your tool.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptography

Caveat crypto user.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

