Delivery-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:27:43 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246DC1E00A9
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 17:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173072FD35;
	Sun,  6 Jul 2014 21:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ACC2FE70
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 21:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9puVFeowTL47 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  6 Jul 2014 21:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FAA2FDBD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 21:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZkSG-1XL0Pq3aSE-00La8i for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 06 Jul 2014 23:16:53 +0200
Message-ID: <53B9BCC2.5060505@gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 16:16:50 -0500
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAOsGNSSZH_JWrRVwdhZAEsO7cMdFhFnKz_FTd2E8Wuxa_Xe4xA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53B94C25.2030709@cryptopathie.eu>
 <1404658233.56244.YahooMailNeo@web140806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <53B97681.5090302@cryptopathie.eu>
 <1404671221.40896.YahooMailNeo@web140805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <53B99868.8050604@gmx.com>
 <1404679159.29806.YahooMailNeo@web140805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1404679159.29806.YahooMailNeo@web140805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cQT4c1M7sx59hV+3UePwobagqbci2Zrx/0R3iY/s8VS9l6DkWzJ
 iwvs5ophBDKjZHzjU1BV5Yihha8gn2K+4GoLv8qzeMQX2oLPc9toAOxYu904E4grtTj8ZF5
 uMn918xNJcc5QH+bJMocjTYOYwgZLSvvgycSIBFDCiMeNYzMJHpivaoeHg9KZB8hXZim7xE
 jQQhjf/MiD4RUKl1i3h8g==
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] washingtonpost.com: In NSA-intercepted data,
 those not targeted far outnumber the foreigners who are
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 7/6/2014 3:39 PM, C B wrote:
> Not as many live here as vacation here. A very large number of the rich and powerful visit. And as the first in the nation primary, every Presidential candidate spends a lot of time here. Yes it is often hard to get laws against things because politicians do not want to get caught. We recently outlawed using cellphones in a very restrictive law that I certainly hope is repealed before it goes into effect next year. We do not require seat belts or motor cycle helmets, but have fairly widespread use of each. But as to privacy we are very strict. Some of the world's experts on privacy live here too.
>   
New Hampshire has its elected officials, like any other state.  So, I 
can't image the elected ones are behind the increased privacy. Unless NH 
politicians are so far "ahead of the curve" compared to politicians in 
other states?
Or, there could be a "secret society" that largely runs NH & wants 
better privacy?

Surely, NH doesn't have any more powerful visitors than say, 
Connecticut, Hawaii, Washington DC or several others?

"Don't require seat belts?"  Kinda behind times, isn't it?  Does NH 
allow "new fangled motorized automobiles" on the streets? :D Aren't seat 
belts a federal requirement, or if not, doesn't a state choosing not to 
require them, lose a whole lot of federal funding? "New Hampshire - The 
Live Fast & Die Hard State."...  hee-hee
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

