Delivery-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 05:28:22 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389E41E0A2B
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 05:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB812FD2A;
	Sat,  5 Jul 2014 09:28:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C472F42A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 09:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id W3KxZjOiBoN1 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  5 Jul 2014 09:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755962E402
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 09:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so2623230oag.9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=KrpC9jHnfgiNzaDbBjyEca/Puusa0PAI6l7JydfLI5Q=;
 b=stU/d7ZzkcXlkwEVJu2QJc+V86MGEL6Ofm7HphunKgfywJpHnDDA7KGaSjz1+cAOlN
 zvZ2h6pyvqGkvmDRhXXjUnqUzqmSIIXzFmkMcCyU7OrHTo2Zegr4JvMxfC6mea0BXQ0n
 zdUahFxz3ms19qJeO1BSgWPE99VpohlEtpzslqilBZ17Y8GhHR5xezWhab6G3Pn5+ggA
 TdVdheBiqvdQPEP+thSycXRSNAxe37PF8kEHvavUGTwpfvEHiFhTPbagT7xjUqJf6WOi
 QAJ4BZMCBhyeNC7wZw0SZkkZJIrZZ6jwKCL4eYtsg9sMMrDkbfidflaI+eM+p4O/jH6F
 f+3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.60.225 with SMTP id k1mr17659901obr.48.1404552090268;
 Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.20.114 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53B7BE54.4080200@bitmessage.ch>
References: <53B7BE54.4080200@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 19:21:30 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NmHvdDLLOgK2oQHQnJilYthudHg
Message-ID: <CAOsGNSRYmU5GWs4LeDMo_okdxqibwO=NQBS-oJS=Z6CbBFanmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Which tor friendly provider is more helpful?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

n 7/5/14, Red Sonja <BM-2cTpEdTADjx2bQf6WuuX1CPER78Sq3xL76@bitmessage.ch> wrote:
> I have a small site. Smaller than 1M if zipped. It is static. And it
> probably won't get much traffic. So 20Gb storage and 200Gb bandwidth are
> pointless in my case. I would like no ads, no tracking for the reader,
> faster, good uptime, and so on.
>
> What would you recommend? What do you use? Free of course.

Godaddy and most other domain providers will provide some hosting space.

Also, your home ISP account will often come with 20M space - by the
sound of it massive compared to your needs.

Perhaps buy an OpenWRT compatible router or adsl modem, and run Tor on
that to host your site from home. That's what I would do if I were not
expecting any significant traffic.

(I'm assuming your site content is legal in your jurisdiction, and I'm
kind of pointing out how many assumptions you have left us to make.)

Good luck,
Zenaan
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

