Delivery-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 01:58:50 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2631E0D5C
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 01:58:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A042F4EF;
	Sat,  5 Jul 2014 05:58:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9792FD6E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 05:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id S-76XE9iwRfI for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  5 Jul 2014 05:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.headstrong.de (mail.headstrong.de
 [IPv6:2a02:180:a:25:2::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E352FD6A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 05:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.headstrong.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFE31C00245
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 07:55:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=headstrong.de;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=mail; t=1404539719; x=
 1406354120; bh=a870dzSpc3Zm+zv9QgHYPlARFFRgMriNTeTL0EzfxOw=; b=C
 Oszdeh92V8AtQtTc0By6xgPLcXWL4I/onjtrzNHK4/N6MZsI5lcOBE26CfQGZFeX
 mRl3Ycc3kZ1PM5VFzuZs3gD9lGI6Hoqp6Hf37Ona+YkzHjn3APTHfx4ScVEL7xFt
 OaR+M8Zo/BcEus4SUQj4dL5rNmzEIJLrSmpWxlf8gM=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.headstrong.de
Received: from mail.headstrong.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.headstrong.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id AmVkz7e3mafp for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  5 Jul 2014 07:55:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53B79366.3050405@torservers.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:55:50 +0200
From: Moritz Bartl <moritz@torservers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20140701174228.61787hk50z2lhmgw@www.vfemail.net>
 <53B47174.6040507@torservers.net>
 <CAKkunMZuJuaRHKvLo8POwn1exaZceaj-uaR4ej=xmOpQgUqHgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <53B4D3BD.2040106@torservers.net>
 <CAKkunMb4k6TJR6+a8bzwttGRqMLmHN6E_dg5RxcfFY0Tq_OuNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOsGNSQvPQyVmunWFVM6MMvrrNDyVNRD1zZgdWKxsKbjiWeoHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <53B58F84.2060406@gmx.com>
 <1404415380.64225.YahooMailNeo@web140806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <53B71501.5080105@gmx.com> <53B78126.6050202@torservers.net>
 <CAOsGNSSTY4kkEgmVP5=ZEpu7TGXpGO6Q_EUOTMkiEsD_6z=bPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOsGNSSTY4kkEgmVP5=ZEpu7TGXpGO6Q_EUOTMkiEsD_6z=bPA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Exit Operator convicted in Austrian lower court
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 07/05/2014 07:30 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I'm not sure the TorExitGuidelines provide an adequate
> Behaviour FAQ, in the hindsight of recent events.

Again: There is no "hindsight of recent events". There just can't be,
because the court opinion has not been released yet.

It has always been the case that Tor exit operators were threatened,
harassed, received email, had to change ISPs, face seizures, raids, and
lawsuits. Nothing has changed.

If you are European, you will fully understand that a single opinion by
a lowest court HAS NO EFFECT WHATSOEVER.

And, again, HE WAS NOT CONVICTED PURELY BECAUSE OF RUNNING AND EXIT.

read that again

HE WAS NOT CONVICTED BECAUSE OF RUNNING AND EXIT.

Every single character of any of the emails in this thread are PURELY
ASSUMPTIONS.

> - Node operators (relays, entries and exits) are advised to be
> especially careful with their exercise of their right to free speech
> in all public forums. A healthy paranoia is recommended in such public
> circumstances.

Sorry: bullshit.

> - Consider that everything you say in public (and everything on the
> internet is public) will most likely be held against you in a court of
> law, should you (in the extreme case) find yourself as a Defendant in
> a court case where your activities are related to Tor.

That is true for whatever you do, and in no way special to Tor.

> Don't get me wrong: disclaimers and appropriate cautions are good things.

Sorry, but especially the United States is way beyond crazy when it
comes to disclaimers. Not before long and underwear comes with a DON'T
SHIT IN YOUR PANTS label.

> Sorry, I'm ranting now...

Yeah, me, too. Sorry.

> Is it ok to prompt and suggest and debate potential FAQ/site
> enhancements here on tor-talk?

Sure! That's where they everything except code developemnt is supposed
to be discussed! Final, discussed and reviewed patches to the website
can be added to https://trac.torproject.org/ with the Website category
assigned.

Thanks for getting this started! I suggested a separate thread though,
this one is a bit out of control and I bet many will have set their mail
clients to ignore it by now.

-- 
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

