Delivery-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:26:48 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23221E0C9F
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2014 15:26:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8835E2E4CA;
	Tue,  1 Jul 2014 19:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DF02E2CB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2014 19:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id fUSRJRIlezoY for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  1 Jul 2014 19:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com (mail-yk0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCC62D931
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2014 19:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 79so5927529ykr.14
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=HdJtz2gBwPvos02ZWVQCAYGP7OkCukx6L4AITjBWYq4=;
 b=OBaS3qZaKJMDmGWHV4PVMWuixmEGMU/EUhAHEP3mH0xQfM7byri9y6WA9YO1kwYiga
 hr27oRsKxe47xLwGlwipZ8m3k1kTjwA6G6Oa3SmmIceQKtAUZ14wastlRRFqxZ7b0gtY
 gyBAiLbjTRCJDnwypgtZArA8ti0sywl8TWh+alVwcV29Q6mnDWwFnV1k0HtxxYvJq9H/
 Eb0qdUUeUU2RD2+Rw9vmd78rzIb98V3KUvTSTDmjddeBTT6kZGZyUHcrzD4Gc2202jVw
 m4POjImTlsrxHDxmOyZCSj+Y+5vzDBAlwuAt0BY9wZpaZg9c+MOvot7SLVESFpxg68We
 qC+w==
X-Received: by 10.236.29.7 with SMTP id h7mr73207419yha.42.1404242103885;
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown ([64.76.4.113])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d98sm29478184yhq.21.2014.07.01.12.15.01
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:18:40 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20140701161840.00004112@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <DUB121-W257E25780AF7E06F86145CC8070@phx.gbl>
References: <53b16e92.4bb.dd547700.2a1fac89@t-3.net>
 <20140630181150.579a117b@gate.rlogin.net>
 <DUB121-W340733C713F86F8887940DC8040@phx.gbl>
 <53B234B4.5010705@cyblings.on.ca>
 <DUB121-W87B38C15F614AFC2BF53BC8070@phx.gbl>
 <272befac-46cd-4eb4-b1d8-73aa517f590d@email.android.com>
 <DUB121-W257E25780AF7E06F86145CC8070@phx.gbl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0cvs12 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
 Anonymity
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:32:27 +0100
Mark McCarron <mark.mccarron@live.co.uk> wrote:

> Alex,
> =

> You must be living in a fantasy land.  The problem still remains, Tor
> is vulnerable to a global view and that global view exists according
> to Snowden.  Further, it would appear that Tor was designed to fit
> into that global view and provide US intelligence with the locations
> of both users and hidden services, whilst pretending to provide
> anonymity.
> =

> I don't see anyone denying it.  Do you?

	Well, Roger Dingledine  said =


	=A8I've tried to tolerate the conspiracy theories / trolling here,
	since there are legitimate worries to be had about what attacks
	various adversaries may have come up with,=A8

	Keywords being =A8legitimate worries=A8.

	I find it funny(entertaining) that whereas key tor people are
	willing to admit that the picture isnt exactly rosy, =


	www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf =


	several voices in  this list seem to be pretending
	exactly the opposite.  And some of them candidly admit =A8 I am
	not a mathematician, statistician nor Tor programmer=A8 (Zenaan) =


	----------------

	Question for the experts out there, both real and imagined. =


	Is freenet=B4s distributed data storage more robust than tor=B4s
	model? (assume tor is being used only as storage)

	Or is freenet just as susceptible to traffic analysis as tor
	is? =


	=


J




	=

	=



	=










	=





> =

> Its been 6 days already.
> =

> Regards,
> =

> Mark McCarron
> =

> > From: fuerschpiu@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:39:13 +0200
> > To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor
> > Security and	Anonymity
> > =

> > Please Mccarron, =

> > =

> > The discussion is dead. You killed it yourself by not adding
> > anything meaningful as far as I have seen. You just repeat yourself
> > again and again as if it's a mantra. You got statistics to back up
> > your claims? Good - show them! You got the script you used to track
> > the onions? Awesome! Show it so we can see for ourselves and use it
> > too! =

> > =

> > As others pointed out already: give us something to work with, else
> > you can just pack up and troll another list as far as I am
> > concerned. =

> > =

> > -- =

> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>  		 	   		  =


-- =

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

