Delivery-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:15:06 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3791E0514;
	Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:15:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F1539321;
	Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17680392CF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:14:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Rk34u-0flRDo for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:14:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9726639249
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 78so22935552lfy.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:14:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=+vff1+T5gts5Q/i5cMkQYlGVlc6RhKAOAcRcs82QYxQ=;
 b=p9nQKygjrDGTeA7fx3R3eh1P/I/4nXMIR6NiAX0N4PxXSiA8gOtvyKG7TjAdw7vKof
 a4LEE1nXLE5a4hWJ+WigOvtVRzd42drw1CYTX4IFb2K8K0Jo0fhrPIP951kybQwkRo7R
 7aFIxBJarp1oMLx5ww/uSgklOkWhS4WYwvbhkNdPvsX9Fo6f5GEAIblfdDDuUCYYA2AR
 IVeyJFJSUC/P1F1H7zalLNRHzYRvobmj6DdD335WLgAECYxoMdnhozbEjGeK6b98cwfL
 NKCdjJJ25nrt8TIlIkSNaIIKcdptnJCurwDoUq3Yxz+3qhipiYS5Tkkry80m+0JoPC0t
 iRxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=+vff1+T5gts5Q/i5cMkQYlGVlc6RhKAOAcRcs82QYxQ=;
 b=QagaosYi6Nw4RKBjdjMx5egK8gLw0XTgyyI9al5+e+1R5oLNDtYuDwNH347R5qIkox
 RsUaw++W9nKwe1rZXOZMwaV9xqA+ycrt+7M+hH0vuvqN7N25oybAhlsqcsARpQ0Xsozd
 QUn9D12V1iFKD3bngUVCDqvTmUzxmRIWB6R34KUQP6nP4wwwKEQGXIP67Z9x8s2I27mz
 5mmwSQONxMNPS6Innb7Co0U2pUZBB22NhZRH4eiIjvpd8MU3NLBdyy3J9tuxg5SZGWah
 qFndjeo3kfW/sPMMRofeTEdjX5K3fQq7UCO5olsPFqd+8xM/leB49aD61Dzs8nKnB1mS
 h+bQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQSIWx/j+Lz6VENxUGsN3kHyJGLGDPOsh7ufgdwLVoJJe+0qrA/SE/yzHkQnhahLY7pok46oyR8mpZj3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.18.25 with SMTP id h25mr3963441lfi.165.1454152491940;
 Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.63.73 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.63.73 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:14:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56AC94C3.3030501@gmail.com>
References: <56AB637C.8070001@anonymous.coward.posteo.de>
 <56AC1AC2.6090706@cajuntechie.org>
 <CAPHRpdVyR6u8U42BBCiV75_YvfvQ_jHTNe07i254-CDqyTqXow@mail.gmail.com>
 <B010BF1C-A31E-4B3E-A2ED-C8F878C06E15@cajuntechie.org>
 <56AC94C3.3030501@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:14:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPHRpdVfh7femvUBHyR3_g7KESBAuF8YX=PQ8SF6FNYP4cKv0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Tom A." <thomasasta@googlemail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or
multiplicators. I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete. Regards
Tom
Am 30.01.2016 11:47 schrieb "Jeremy Rand" <biolizard89@gmail.com>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01/30/2016 04:30 AM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> > Thanks Tom but I want even aware that Bitmail existed lol.  I think
> > these are problems I've seen talked about around Bitmessage.  For
> > example, someone can observe you connect to peers and know you're
> > transmitting data through them.  But maybe not to whom or what your
> > saying.  Am I wrong?  If I am, this is going to make my day.  I
> > love Bitmessage but this has always bugged me.  Also, what about a
> > security audit?
> >
> > Anthony
>
> AFAIK you are correct; your peers and anyone watching you talk to them
> can easily see when you send a message in Bitmessage.  In theory this
> is obscured by relaying messages from other people, but I suspect that
> in practice it would be trivial to Sybil the network and see which
> node sent you a message first.  (This attack is regularly performed on
> Bitcoin, whose network structure is somewhat similar to, though shares
> no code with, Bitmessage.)
>
> Also, since Tom spammed a link to BitMail, it's worth noting that
> BitMail appears to be developed by the same people who made GoldBug.
> For those of you keeping score at home, GoldBug falsely claimed to be
> a project of EFF and CCC.  It would be wise to assume that BitMail is
> malware or backdoored unless proven otherwise.  As with all other
> software hosted by SourceForge these days.
>
> - -Jeremy Rand
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWrJSbAAoJEAHN/EbZ1y06AhAQALDx8+Hgcsn+xzYR1xzwADo7
> aCZTjowri0skbZ0gfEXZu2IikTQAMRSeGMykCeCpy8bv2wESFZEI7lCbBB16Iktk
> jYVMaG6XComcL2sTwiecz++1wCYnp5hA5KDjQxZ70T9K2+ro0duXidFW674lKaB0
> qW2y13p1amWi3yKNosUait1+IhI2z6VUMAxL3O1jBICxQVBIMVuvgzRxZ9SpzWSR
> vDD7Yg3mrTjcyVHB0p/Qt1IQNCDqO0MN/5GRQONOf4wOJe4GFFaGq67ycPde352/
> /Bfye8keSQR1SjImrF0ncKNC3pSjJEA4YZb8TLVWdYSxzreA5D62GtKFWfRl8N7o
> diSkt3jW+Pnj/YncjZcI807CrRgesXGcvck1czJ+f0YpQ4ieRr5OMYPPamPeiekI
> BXSN3wyH3Z+tTlYfmEn3lvfzS2QkS+/klDtdFOVBmhX2Fkqb4Wrs33VNC4n1kuOt
> R5elW2U1xsomFFJWAvORbozvJ5ntrKdBW17mUSQ4r2/KaVrs/meeq+S2c2lp5bUl
> 8+YLaHWDHYgiWdR4l09UNA+j4PN3ip22RTC2S+1fwvkURzo3ftn+VYd4YXr+71oj
> ZW2Fojtn+p6N+b5kAcv4u8aiKIk3xCDseaHO6EczSRCs9ismcAlbPY2WscL7URHL
> TiDKZdWwZ6xxDEx6x50c
> =sHWr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

