Delivery-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:55:26 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY,
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0511E3736;
	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:55:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF91391A5;
	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B8939210
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id TzeNtgHiWkKL for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D49253913C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g73so82575559ioe.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:55:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=kjP0jujRCRqPBhSukD80GkKT8wy08pkNXFnxuOzX1Us=;
 b=EaYD33qh+Kc7LZszxNiKegy5SOpQYwU0dBhG3iB3EDFDAgW+4b07KleikjxbznoNol
 NS2SoyzfBj3eI9Li7ti/faXvMeroLitoj22X9psKTNM4F4m6hE+dtCBLm0ju/3YdpyL6
 yiQoDzkcXCWeeOVCtG8m50k/Cl0q7P1iiJmb4TIPAtSC9h/JWVt/4PD0T5OAEYOwMR7i
 fFIfy1sJQ0e9xg1EzKKEBxkr48trkizGRKJJ3GHel1RmamGNOnf6QozIqTEiHfdUhwin
 hN5HvxVzBbM28V+Qo+tEVcaWLxWia8aH+IPsn3nC250aG529MbdNoPX95MWEIBrkCDS9
 4FFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=kjP0jujRCRqPBhSukD80GkKT8wy08pkNXFnxuOzX1Us=;
 b=eFtkcVhTFnu3By525F6pA7CTEiQ982+YGIrwXt41MN3dRarcJOaxFGCrM2C20ofBW6
 U0QpSV3yNjnuXhLEDIXkA/yTt5fkxOiuJ4JYJJuiW9XtmrvHf5cOYWYyU/LHUbEe5Q5l
 wiH2Vh6ZEUv6O5gEraadlub9JlcL1EUQCamaDDE+qjGy4Fs93udOb2/zgNNWl+jRgLHn
 IJwmYS67TdE996FKvMGAsWU8U6MjA6YRG/ukXWTZ+Ov/NhzsuIuqbUrU+VmjB0XoBXOq
 9Qxq3lVs6Ew/S4NewCDH2zNcA/z9iUVm7amVuqRXJmjepZOUmuiLaqoPZoJTuUqc7PTw
 trNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSE0rpU90XGu1n7k52eASqtoW2wUUgaJAJrZYcdUM7gq2s98PL+Pw5Ly2zbl0eJ2rOA2WZOF1Jj8rN+1w==
X-Received: by 10.107.7.37 with SMTP id 37mr8933913ioh.17.1454054110638; Thu,
 28 Jan 2016 23:55:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.137.197 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:54:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56A9E0BB.7070202@infosecurity.ch>
References: <56A9E0BB.7070202@infosecurity.ch>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:54:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2-hWzpwAb6jMZZWwMQKsymecejg2VfabnVrBEtQ4fStiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Different degree of identification ->
 trustworthiness of Tor Relay operators
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Brought up adding these human factors to relays
and user programmatic selection of various class of
relay, torizen provided classes, etc many times over
years in web of trust posts. It never seems to go anywhere.
Maybe people are more afraid of relays now.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

