Delivery-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:23:15 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D03B1E0192;
	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:23:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A85836821;
	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB8B36251
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id PRNrzAgGQ7wn for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3BB3622A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u188so43067800wmu.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:23:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:subject:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=drW2yT5rB5gL7UZQFBfthlX1o1luuvqXl8FLKo3oy+k=;
 b=sW0Qm5XyL9gp8awDFGLAsrHr/6c8wLXCMfbQOOJLM87alaPhBB2X5qHx6GqB2OrzpL
 sD3cLY7oXkSxu780FDsVelT1ytraGdG90fRD6BTqHLAKITrURYABEu+VXWaJL4Ps6/LY
 ljOlVXXL27oJ9nlB5OVZdI+7i1mM+onWapuVZoFTk7B3ZTTcHMjS8mrxC/P7OYwVYw8h
 ZPcqXINtaAM0pgzD+zCwdBvtMnlpeu50VcmNXv+4wo0ENjPcTGTv4/aHPfrWMDNiScqR
 UM7cK2VKZTS+uBDH8eTF+vCmUR+Z31zfuo+5XpIP6f5V0KiaJylceNi7RByv/D0KvG04
 Snxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=drW2yT5rB5gL7UZQFBfthlX1o1luuvqXl8FLKo3oy+k=;
 b=OhWZ/Q/DJ+LD89rGcDeASqG21TOOFOqPPXGwpRJIVz3LUfdPLrxcmLjZ6+c8ckSUZC
 VxD0zgIyXDr2ud00RSN3diRSTC0N9anRzrQaplwZJxwYqNOgmzgKuq2RAVXJD03kMZ0f
 NZemH57lVkUhrPLhEI/FYXVoosvfSm+lYZ9wZb5ohk65MwSfcZBPFfgD8ohSJ3Rd0sbZ
 oM525LlvgnvZOHH1oc4h2rQs/DSrd3cUP8obzVBu8y/mDpChgt/9cPm0/j7Ju1gdQ3K2
 HKm36T86H3K6pmIWeVkPwkIbWIHm6oeGDBBoEf9/SLiTnPXwxxPnA0tDwnfk2oeE+xA9
 j4jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSLc/Grl9+al5on1D11NVCi5J+L7bU5DphskIAJIzvi6ZnqEfQyHQQpjIgl7SyHlg==
X-Received: by 10.194.176.74 with SMTP id cg10mr16174919wjc.169.1453666980041; 
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.41.91] (195-154-136-42.rev.poneytelecom.eu.
 [195.154.136.42])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm12933253wmy.15.2016.01.24.12.22.59
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:22:59 -0800 (PST)
From: aka <akademiker1@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: aka <akademiker1@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <n82b3t$g4v$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <56A53291.8060708@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:22:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <n82b3t$g4v$1@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Using VPN less safe?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Oskar Wendel:
> Today I thought about something...
> 
> Let's assume that attacker (government) seizes the hidden service and 
> wants to run it and deanonymize its users with traffic correlation.
> 
> Attacker could easily tap into major VPN providers traffic and try to 
> correlate their traffic with hidden service traffic. And there are fewer 
> VPN providers than Tor entry guards (and much less than home connections 
> around the globe).
> 
> Does it mean that routing Tor through a commercial VPN could actually 
> lower the security, compared to routing Tor directly through a home 
> connection? It's in contrast with what many say, that you should use 
> a commercial VPN for extra security.
> 
> 

Why not Tor over Tor? Using a Tor exit to connect to the first hop.
Would require traffic correlating twice.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

