Delivery-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:18:51 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A841E0342;
	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:18:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE64C35369;
	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5038E2680D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:18:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 0WQmus5VaRun for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:18:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A21220F0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:18:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6524E1A1A27
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:18:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1453634319; bh=3+RMlpG+aoUbSXsB/4lS+ZE+g+as0tWsUinpcOQy90M=;
 h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To:From;
 b=atSx4a8Ivv8ppxze7bSkWZ95WbkeDWeTQhevY2Y7YWgzL5NTxIPOWYjqDZHYwpH2C
 wd/URDKn6HqwIJEKx42bbcRbsOaFnwpc0spqM+T9d3gzqIehkarBUxTr3PAS9fQEb5
 dnunjTlHPsr1UAH29uwqsmqVBLoV7rz8t2fk+lHw=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: flipchan) with ESMTPSA id 5163A402D7
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <n82b3t$g4v$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <n82b3t$g4v$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Flipchan <flipchan@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 12:18:33 +0100
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <167D9EEB-338B-4C10-9010-5BF172956157@riseup.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Using VPN less safe?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Do u mean a vpn to tor? Or first tor then a vpn?

Oskar Wendel <o.wendel@wp.pl> skrev: (24 januari 2016 12:04:30 CET)
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Today I thought about something...
>
>Let's assume that attacker (government) seizes the hidden service and 
>wants to run it and deanonymize its users with traffic correlation.
>
>Attacker could easily tap into major VPN providers traffic and try to 
>correlate their traffic with hidden service traffic. And there are
>fewer 
>VPN providers than Tor entry guards (and much less than home
>connections 
>around the globe).
>
>Does it mean that routing Tor through a commercial VPN could actually 
>lower the security, compared to routing Tor directly through a home 
>connection? It's in contrast with what many say, that you should use 
>a commercial VPN for extra security.
>
>- -- 
>Oskar Wendel, o.wendel@wp.pl.REMOVE.THIS
>Pubkey: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x6690CC52318DB84C
>Fingerprint: C8C4 B75C BB72 36FB 94B4 925C 6690 CC52 318D B84C
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWpK+8AAoJEGaQzFIxjbhMk6wH/RNFA38ceVBhetnVPUTHhrsz
>DC5TerZ0NW39Gn6f4rz66QryjHuTVNqzFwUBTuGSQZw5JjENQeOO53RuFiG1xsWM
>iFE/UNgezAIX+AaYoZOdaocICtMkWPW9gyddWbRN8vG3/0L4TQTD2wdND4We2x+6
>W/uQMKtQ/rH8z/O2vMgetsNdNDp/6V7eKrKxWUkq70Nz+LwD5I8K4ONOJgt7Gd1g
>Uo8syPFktHlISyquoDDqldOvoN4RTwb8F1+nL8k+q/hYC1HJDHSOjOaMW72OjlpK
>fAymg+vzK7yg+pOgBvYhi/ojdHBCiajQBx6X+SI1dodINeQm84SjXBgMXPREVF4=
>=B7jK
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>-- 
>tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- 
Sincerly Flipchan
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

