Delivery-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:01:35 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0F81E0329;
	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:01:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D4138B6A;
	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3071C37115
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:01:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id xOs8PzYX21ah for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:01:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailout1.srv-net.de (mailout1.srv-net.de [78.138.95.126])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F5C3538C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from s01.srv-net.de (s01.srv-net.de [79.133.57.11])
 by mailout1.srv-net.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F021F7A1EE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:01:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-yk0-f180.google.com (mail-yk0-f180.google.com
 [209.85.160.180])
 by s01.srv-net.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DCB1A896A6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:01:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-yk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id a85so528324919ykb.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:01:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORddlqYC5uml8S4t0VKtDug9ymFbVVuuu5Y79ry+SkzT66N7hHJbdPoRGfNPnlQTTevs7tPNh+VmaXmYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.71.65 with SMTP id u62mr14132874ywa.162.1453107672196;
 Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.224.150 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:01:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <569C2E4B.9070206@jump-ing.de>
References: <CAAstKWCnHJEtm6Ujvfqjupez0rEo0wU8z3PAGX6yRf0UQqzQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <569C2E4B.9070206@jump-ing.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:01:12 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAAstKWCjfRtHBvjT4SNb-eukotwXaDmtcCTx72Hr28fXwGA5JA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAstKWCjfRtHBvjT4SNb-eukotwXaDmtcCTx72Hr28fXwGA5JA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_St=C3=B6veken?= <christian@connector.one>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at s01.srv-net.de
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] transparent tor routers
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> wrote:

>
> - Typical ISP plans have ridiculously low upstream rates, at least here
> in Germany. For example a popular DSL contract is 16 Mbit downstream,
> but only 1 Mbit upstream. To operate a relay or gateway the lower of
> both numbers matters, so one can offer only one Mbit.
>
I'm only talking about exit nodes at the moment. A relay feature could be
provided as opt-in, if the upstream is high enough.


- Why do you see a need for dedicated hardware? An off the shelf router
> running OpenWRT works just fine. Install the tor package, edit torrc and
> it works.

Because that just works for it savy people. How many are there around you?


> - One thing is indeed missing: up to date Tor packages for OpenWRT.
>
Their current stable release comes with Tor 0.2.5.12, several versions
> behind what the Tor project offers.
>
I will have to check if we are already building newer versions.


>
> In case you want to have a look (my plan is 20/1 Mbit cable):
>
> https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/C1B80BA2D97C33851DE08FD061F531A129705988
>
> Did an upgrade on Jan 4th and forgot to backup the keys, so data
> currently goes only 2 weeks back. Graphs weren't much better with the
> previous keys, over a whole year only 2 or 3 days actually forwarding
> some TCP packages.
>
Being curious I will indeed have a look.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

