Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:52:56 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB70A1E0A5A;
	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:52:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D749340A5;
	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0722436E9A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:52:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id DSfgS1cqFP3Z for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20C036E00
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:52:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60C31A1D08
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1452815559; bh=GO6nsHwSiEOT7oDHSeF0NDYtKZPEz/utyoO9C/CSl18=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=mKeOZ9HOxEQx8YGUF07SpCY+4v79htkf4qV2RnUNgtSfYcpJVvUHHiE6jc+cjROCx
 K46YwNBbLw0Ww63YBpQUu4iFm5JhM93MpUylFdx2fS3Ibvb0nC0TWnuV0toBWxoSvN
 XuzkfUE3kzEPGfS8Rl+jZHW9rlX1knKEqn49jcxs=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: kleft) with ESMTPSA id 6B181402C8
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <1060465114.4981.ede87f0a-ad35-4ee6-9b4a-7a3e0e9bbc95.open-xchange@office.mailbox.org>
From: kleft <kleft@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1210
Message-ID: <569834C5.1010304@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:52:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1060465114.4981.ede87f0a-ad35-4ee6-9b4a-7a3e0e9bbc95.open-xchange@office.mailbox.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Entry
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I'm not actually sure but I think this behavior results from one of the
Tor security features. It's about to minimize the risk of using
malformed entries cause choosing only a few random nodes as entry guards
seems to be still better than a random selection with every new circuit.
Please see https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#EntryGuards for
further details.
 
> I understand circuit isolation in Tor Browser but see same entry every circuit,
> no matter site.
>
> Will you explain?
>
> Thx.
>
> 00011110
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=xtHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

