Delivery-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:59:42 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DAA1E0B52;
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:59:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538B53840A;
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:58:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD3E205A3;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id PdIz6dXXq9Qs; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3B820326;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 1so328503412ion.1;
 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:58:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=Ggk5lL67UqZlyAJTwA5RJ8B1a9QC7yCnFRijSjyo2uU=;
 b=u5BR/1RcW2vlDin8zTDE086wieWJ6QU8D3GP9RFK+Ry2gjH4QKQFGMwgXa5pQ3g3Ej
 zAqKLm3emqjikWmmtYLn0aadYh7GMY8/vomklFWPXZr6mxIv2qhbRmZ541u2L8gSF/jS
 JXDzmJbiImNSb325iA+3Hcn0fpX2uKawxhzJm8zOqPk0dzBdLKDSIuoqyzFn19l4PXUk
 MwVkJ6nrIIepBy1L37VB47ElzyVKSDgx6FQPuJ4XloRT/j15mi6dZ5sDXRFPABqbJiO5
 0UP6D8h2CzLkk82jW29ADsBOoe69GBQbT9nYtVkxfvYk2QVBX3ssPCizsgvugGXZRjnh
 +0yg==
X-Received: by 10.107.43.138 with SMTP id r132mr131086022ior.7.1452585522993; 
 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:58:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.137.197 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:58:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <569492DA.1010901@riseup.net>
References: <20160112034329.GI12042@happy.bamsoftware.com>
 <569492DA.1010901@riseup.net>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:58:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti28DaL=qyPM+c71XcydEhgNRDd1Yo3=jqyojEj8bT5_sAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
Cc: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org, tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [tor-dev] How many exits exit from an IP address
 different than their OR address? (10.7%)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Jesse V <kernelcorn@riseup.net> wrote:
> This is quite interesting, thanks for the report. I'm not sure why it
> would be advantageous to set up a server or network this way, but I
> guess they have their reasons.

1) They may or may not be aware of their routing, or the routing
applied to them.
2) Having this feature in the network doesn't break anything, except for maybe
check.torproject.org, and a handful of clearnet sites that attempt and
often fail
to redirect you to their onion, no big deal, hit the new circuit
button and try again.
3) Having this feature in the network greatly enhances Tor user's ability
to select an exit and get around silly Tor blocks that rely on various
consensus,
RBL, DNS, whatever lists. Whether it's censorship of the source or destination,
it's still censorship. And getting around censorship is one key
features and critical
use cases of Tor.

There is no specification that says exits must exit from their OR IP,
or any other IP.
I seriously don't know why people continue to get their panties in a
bunch over this.
Please stop. Nice stats though.

cc tt tr because relavance
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

