Delivery-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 09:49:13 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589531E032D
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2015 09:49:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECBA32F96;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2015 14:49:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E532F8F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2015 14:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id IJaQvXVq3Skb for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  4 Jan 2015 14:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F5632F8E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2015 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E0340DBA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2015 14:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1420382938; bh=pCgbO3yh7VGwXffwG5LlLMUOdVoO/+TFnRh2GvAie58=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=WU8FsJ3sa8EDRau1kV7wZfPgNSw8qnXQ45+hV+HWiStFzofov8GGHxoXtAgZESbaK
 sHpHZLqil3pvzQxcDdab3/xCvMWt/sHycycF2N3ERnvfNbLDwf0I7zWCoQ09iZ+6go
 u3TLSjb5cUeiAD5/e5sLqSbOHk0l2auoSr9RszJ8=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: irregulator) with ESMTPSA id 54B6F4000E
Message-ID: <54A952CF.5040109@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:48:47 +0200
From: Alexandros <irregulator@riseup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAFo=-36FHvQjyFvuVx-V-dA_93rLmgW8NOW7YipWtMyvaPmfEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFo=-36FHvQjyFvuVx-V-dA_93rLmgW8NOW7YipWtMyvaPmfEg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] please advise on renting a gigabit capable dedicated
 server
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 01/03/2015 03:31 AM, Christopher Yeager wrote:
> Hi tor users, my coworkers and I are considering getting together to
> run a gigabit exit relay and are curious if you all have advice as to
> the best place to go shopping for a server with 1gbps dedicated
> bandwidth in a location that is helpful to the network. Someone on irc
> pointed me to this list, but I'm happy to ask on another if it would
> be more appropriate. Thanks in advance!
> 

If you visit compass.torproject.org [1], you group relays by country and
you input "-1" to display all the results, you can get a nice list of
countries hosting relays with bigger percentage weigths in the consensus.

My understanding is that choosing a country outside the top10 or top15
would be a good location in terms of decentralizing the network. Of
course these countries may have more expensive hosting solutions.

[1] https://compass.torproject.org
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

