Delivery-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 07:57:07 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D137E1E022E
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat,  3 Jan 2015 07:57:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F8B32E7A;
	Sat,  3 Jan 2015 12:56:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D78132E6D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  3 Jan 2015 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id PujdSHkbBJia for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  3 Jan 2015 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF7D32E6C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  3 Jan 2015 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so55825489obc.11
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:56:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=Q8/OkUDrlqckEuaJOyi90RhlV3U/Uo64ERouE5KQKJM=;
 b=Mu4VW/Ken8o1S7rGuYazMQZs6scHHziiIHliV4FJu6+xt+URVpHSIxd7V5QJQ1qsAA
 0lSucWW0roUKWZ6EhBmrNhByKI6CdR9ZpG+BXTVVwyPfUtGtVcVf+Kbw/b2UuFMm8uTt
 B/dxiT+hqMSs19biLBoPv37GWRyPSi8P/eVnbDLG4N1SKr+WwhhSw2hW5yrONBNLAlbG
 Ww/GODa9ZyY1F1+ulHLjtj6hnIJzLzFcBJaQWcU8tIpY4u6mDBxdHjSuAXUcH8Td5BZK
 LhdDH5sEm9Vn5eVpEU6ltqLp9o7l8yj1E4ltE9UCxC9WADTbeWRGbv1nT33Kmj5ymOHH
 teXw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.123.14 with SMTP id lw14mr7251988oeb.31.1420289813103;
 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.102.241 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 04:56:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54A78CC7.3030907@gmail.com>
References: <54A771A4.3000805@cyblings.on.ca>
	<54A78CC7.3030907@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 07:56:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29sXnfGwSObs10+QS50i=jdMjiaDZCo-2euU6tQTcsDEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is Tor a VPN or ISP?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Rand <biolizard89@gmail.com> wrote:
> Look for 41.25 and 41.26

The location holding entity of 25 is the entry guard,
which itself can't be located. And the notice reciever of 26
can't forward or retain regarding that which is unknown
to him. It falls apart under any location hidden anonymous
darknet. (A blanket notice to EGs might work but many
things need would tested before that, including juristiction.)
This law wasn't written for darknets and would be very
hard and expensive for it to even begin to work there.

Further generally, if filesharers would move all their activities onto
the location hidden anonymous darknets a) all their problems
go away, or b) darknets get another test case. Since b) is coming
anyways, they might as well call darknets home (because clearnet
is obviously not ideal place for them).
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

