Delivery-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:23:00 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC271E0523
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:22:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9CB32403;
	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A5F32400
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NtxsvRRpjH7S for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EFE4314ED
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5CB410DD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1422364969; bh=Z2HqKEgwAMN2zUXD8j1vifrgG7k7HIqWiW/B83UDpzA=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=EkNsqDOhTSUIu/XojkQuVerGP0ReZznav5arYzh/Fg7bEvg2mj9/CxY4nzQAqlAAk
 PI6akzSKdaulRADKQ8AvQMd4IipPSx+xSWwhkVbGumUwvE9md6ACsdZNomS39zvRSm
 ngfmN5j5K+VZ2NOUYXgD5F+AKaeyJhqR9wyiCHcc=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: angyr) with ESMTPSA id 5115B20410
Message-ID: <54C79120.8070401@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:22:40 +0000
From: Formidable <formidable@riseup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <54C57E26.7010201@cpunk.us> <54C609CC.5000707@viggy.in>
 <54C62096.9050802@cpunk.us> <54C6E399.8000207@hireahit.com>
 <CAFggDF1JVQ+tjRPk0k-TzbC1aoydDqA7LAL=qcPLL3bW1yjq1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1fcc17e9a6d9220ba39bf378730e99bc.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <1fcc17e9a6d9220ba39bf378730e99bc.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Torbirdy
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I can't get how they can spy by UTC?
If i sends it at UTC+6 and he received it same time at UTC-6,
receiver will find in header UTC time.
So whats the problem, how can he convert it to +12? oO
It seems to be paranoid style worrying about date time header.
Problem is when Date header not set to UTC, but torbirdy make it UTC.

rocket_penguin@riseup.net:
> Why doesn't everyone just use UTC in the Date: header and then the
> computer that the mail is being read on converts it to local time? This
> just makes it so people can spy on where you are/
> 
>> On 1/27/15, Dave Warren <davew@hireahit.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-01-26 03:10, Cypher wrote:
>>>> Also, since the only
>>>> data leaked seems to be the local datetime, I'd think it's not a
>>>> massive
>>>> concern since my local datetime is shared with a few million other
>>>> people.
>>>
>>> While true, the time*zone* is also mentioned, and timezones can be a
>>> more interesting kettle of proverbial fish. Timezone rules vary from
>>> region to region, and so upon observing the dates your DST rules apply,
>>> I might determine your country or geopolitical location more
>>> specifically then just a 1/24th slice of the planet (plus all those
>>> funky :30 zones)
>>>
>>> More complicated is when you travel, if you update the timezone on your
>>> machine, this information is leaked too, so over time, your timezone
>>> information may actually reveal your travel to a very broad degree.
>>> Chances are that it would only take a very small number of
>>> cross-timezone trips for a gov't actor to correlate your timezone shifts
>>> with your travel itinerary, assuming such information is made available
>>> now or in the future.
>>>
>>
>> Of course, which is why we note that this is an issue, one which must
>> be fixed in Thunderbird sadly.
>>
>>> For most people, it's probably not a major risk, but for those who's
>>> livelihood or freedom relies upon anonymity, this is just the sort of
>>> leak that Big Data can use.
>>>
>>
>> Remember we're comparing Thunderbird without TorBirdy vs with
>> TorBirdy: it is strictly better, even if imperfect.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Jacob
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

