Delivery-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:12:16 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BC91E0CFA
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:12:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE06325C8;
	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:12:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B432097
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ANWapTzUqwXO for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org (mail.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.34])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E8631FEA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFBE2E01C8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:12:03 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=user-agent:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :mime-version:received:received; s=openmailbox; t=1422342721;
 bh=fxzD4tjvbbtwntsZTvPv/TrjBusJKxS2SCJPKXViHHg=; b=QfGGvlBZuzDh
 v9VMloPajTp/XQullcsQcVerZ14nahYE38cvB7XKe92yJ6QCcwFgIm8Y53q/sHX3
 C7l0zvaKaytTpFokXpLF/W/DJKVkQygmvL2hvkokaE6HNWyBFEcn3xMBe4vPOPK3
 T/cSns/ojh/4UYK3vPrzDTZ6ZOE3VL8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id QP0fcNqO1o7Q for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:12:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89B92E0075
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:12:01 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:12:01 -0800
From: spencerone@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <1c5d656d493ac75cbe3cb229cf0abd38@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5
Subject: [tor-talk] Torbirdy
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Cypher cypher at cpunk.us:
>> A few months ago, I seem to remember the general advice being not to
>> use Torbirdy. But I see the software was updated only a few months ago
>> so I assume it's in active development. Can I assume Torbirdy is safe
>> to use?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Cypher
>> 
Jacob Appelbaum jacob at appelbaum.net:
> Using TorBirdy is fine - the two time leaks are very small issues
> compared to using Thunderbird without TorBirdy. This is especially so
> for weak crypto, or a total lack of crypto, which may be possible
> without TorBirdy.
> 
> It isn't perfect but it is a whole lot better than plain old
> SMTP/POP/IMAP, HTML email, etc, etc.
> 
> Remember we're comparing Thunderbird without TorBirdy vs with
> TorBirdy: it is strictly better, even if imperfect.
> 
> All the best,
> Jacob

In short, TorBirdy is the shit!

Wordlife,
SpencerOne

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

