Delivery-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:44:28 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8973B1E0C3E
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:44:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146C2337E2;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:44:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C982337CF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id HsCmZguvzNzP for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from boum.org (boum.org [204.13.164.192])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.boum.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66EC9337C9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (censure.boum.org [192.168.122.20])
 by boum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E6951F5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:44:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from boum.org ([192.168.122.29])
 by localhost (censure.boum.org [192.168.122.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LNiNaCtYzwfX for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:44:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from boum.org (boum.org [127.0.0.1])
	with ESMTPSA id 4F3E05201
Received: from boum.org (boum.org [127.0.0.1])	with ESMTP id 65D39729E5A
Message-Id: <85zj9ddtzf.fsf@boum.org>
From: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:26:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [tor-talk] Which PTs shall we prioritize for inclusion in Tails?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hi,

Tails currently supports regular bridges, obfs2 and obfs3.
Work is in progress to support scramblesuit.
I see that Tor Browser 4.5 ships flashproxy, meek and obfs4.

Assuming an ideal world in which they involve an equal amount of work,
among scramblesuit, meek, flashproxy and obfs4, which ones should we
prioritize our efforts on?

(An option is of course "all, just take whatever the Tor Browser
ships", but it's not obvious that it's the best solution for us, hence
my question.)

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

