Delivery-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 06:46:59 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071C71E0480
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri,  2 Jan 2015 06:46:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAD5325E4;
	Fri,  2 Jan 2015 11:46:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C652B32492
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  2 Jan 2015 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id zwTcO5Of9QsE for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  2 Jan 2015 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C54E31C88
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  2 Jan 2015 11:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277D1201D88
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  2 Jan 2015 12:46:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=user-agent:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :mime-version:received:received; s=openmailbox; t=1420199205;
 bh=K6m6OfeFpMuXSHQgh17Wrq0Q3MG57Rfqn8JxARki3j8=; b=dP4cN5geU8I7
 EHjDsdnF4hSDrNG28rCtlKTH3S16PCSBaxy7MoPdom/+YgzgmcR8+APqSdlbVZKu
 /6ZN/InX2ibfZPdwF1SOkqvosdwltdLRTJLktwQ8/D/aMTxss0ONx+aF7MXhWJxZ
 dPaW792t/iW60Kj3LMEfec6SCN5Ne/I=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id IMIS8GHlTPtA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  2 Jan 2015 12:46:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A813A201F31
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  2 Jan 2015 12:46:45 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 03:46:45 -0800
From: spencerone@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <4b827f23b71c7052695ffcfa668100dd@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4
Subject: [tor-talk] All I Want For X-mas: TorPhone
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Arxaios,

Thanks for the passionate response, but it seems like you are 
reconfirming the need for TorPhone.  It seems that only by choice this 
"rule" is followed.  Unless it is the nature of an open programming 
language to write what you want, malicious or not, which I think it is, 
I certainly do not understand the "backdoor" you are referring to 
[classification and experience are not requirements to understanding 
concepts if they are explained clearly].  It seems obvious that if 
someone can make it, someone can break it.  But that doesn't mean we 
should not pursue better security and freedom than we already have with 
our mobile devices.

Happy New Year to you, too.

Awesome,
SpencerOne







> Arxaios haris at arxaios.net wrote:
> 
> The first rule , is not my rule at all, is never never been broken for
> a lot of years now because this rule gives hackers "the freedom" to 
> test
> things. So if you are a programmer you would understand what I am
> talking about. Everything is made with this rule ...protocols , 
> programs
> electronic devices and so on..!!!
> 
> Is not a science fiction nor Orwell .! It is the truth believe it or
> not. The INTERNET what matter you do you rely on already build-ed
> foundations. Do the math... i am not going to argue on this because it
> is pointless.
> 
> No system on earth is secure enough by individual needs. Even if you
> have the actual code then it is running on a pre-build Operating System
> which is already compromised. If that is not enough . the hardware you
> are using has hardware in-printed commands which you do not know what
> they do ...!!
> 
> My point is : NOTHING IS SECURE.
> 
> Happy New year.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

