Delivery-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:16:15 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 444981E0330
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:16:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A0C33284;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B686733283
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 2zSAvZhEWkWN for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org (mail.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.34])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5623322B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773012E01CC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:16:01 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=user-agent:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :mime-version:received:received; s=openmailbox; t=1421745358;
 bh=X148IglPHAm5JeSZE1n0MlJlVl073cS8Mr0rqV7E4dM=; b=mVgi6Hc+j88w
 XA4cXJtrynq7mwzzjlg52KzpLBMA6YgYZEKl0Q/ICAPvJXY0k8NnGYslQi2jLxbm
 XRjylUBjVo3JvUM5n0hZHJzYKj2LuuBU5YDwH9SbcYC+SgshkIvbOBCBXfVcTcWO
 nTEGOoIyiJJxXjODb0M037C2IQwddW8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 3oyncPoHLfnH for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7BB2E0077
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:15:58 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:15:58 -0800
From: spencerone@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <f8533378591939ec7f79c4ff27298fd8@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4
Subject: [tor-talk] Cloudfare reflares
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I see no benefit from having this man in the middle.  The sites are 
public, so is their content.  If the publishers want protection from the 
public, they should stay offline.  Infinite loop of sadness :(

Besides, robots are people, too.

SpencerOne


> grarpamp grarpamp[at]gmail.com:
> Wow, these tweetstreams and reaffirmations towards
> Tor by Cloudflare are highly commendable. Ok thanks.


>> zaki zaki[at]manian.org
>> Ryan Lackey says they are working on it.
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/octal/status/557415774185590784


>>> Mirimir mirimir[at]riseup.net:
>>> Same here.
>>> 
>>> Even when the solution is clear and unambiguous, Cloudflare is often 
>>> not
>>> accepting it. Sometimes I've been getting 404 errors from Nginx.


>>>> JT Allison tor[at]arlen.io:
>>>> They've been trying new stuff today.
>>>> 
>>>> https://twitter.com/grittygrease/status/557309607819743233
>>>> 
>>>> https://twitter.com/grittygrease/status/557317874419654656


>>>>> grarpamp grarpamp[at]gmail.com:
>>>>> Someone here previously mentioned cloudflare
>>>>> was easing up their mechanism.
>>>>> I'm recently seeing a return of the extremely difficult
>>>>> to repeatedly unsolvable captchas.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

