Delivery-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 06:02:40 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 322CA1E02AB
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu,  8 Jan 2015 06:02:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3B13261A;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2015 11:02:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E345A32450
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  8 Jan 2015 11:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id MnPgPm2GP_l1 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  8 Jan 2015 11:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C6231E9F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  8 Jan 2015 11:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x19so8763300ier.13
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 03:02:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=MyLoG8BGhd7ClGk2pVIgrB2m0Xmv74smnbFRURQjZGw=;
 b=QPAZ8gOZEGswfg4F+omNE/lnXrcBaDIFB7++LfhFhBY2Izz6hx+wralY49wY0LB52a
 qlwh3MN3+JSPSHeJ0az1Byob6jHPEAy+KXg0j/caDaPlqguMQhtTvJJJkKno0IN4lcJI
 JkadxNWt5eJrYAMW0bBwJLXmiQ8huJJ4iNEiM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=MyLoG8BGhd7ClGk2pVIgrB2m0Xmv74smnbFRURQjZGw=;
 b=ALe8EIBcz6lgkkN+72t8fumtQ+23DBLJNbrXbq2mrMIBXFdxYB2gCwzhlTcxP+54I7
 o0xvCB2zM/MO2pmGnDp22ky3W3xRdTX3QhRUpaNBpL1Nl0ZmE0x85TCCDpVCMc41hKzV
 YsJrvAVqdIA0Jfpm28vo3YG79OnLnFJrkgvPRSNgn1OmBWn+vcobvKqleANYcMvplsiH
 vbwz7d48aoGTynxT3u3Tm+XwirFWSjIQYm3V0TtT/JqcNVDq06CLsvO+NR+vzGjyW3/a
 cs6CzRe6e9e+ygxHYg1cTFPRfDpPZm6EQwiyFnghouatMowH8RNOE69pkvDc+gukrg11
 FFPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknIh8itv0h/pyJvBBCqMM3+j3riLqs9eO7LD2RMOJPbPjR00hPGAjaOxo76CJvFd4CJu0Y
X-Received: by 10.107.3.37 with SMTP id 37mr8294974iod.82.1420714947077; Thu,
 08 Jan 2015 03:02:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.225.167 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 03:02:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaLD9KTooyQGPg+sv42ZHrn2=vRSO_Jm26O23wb_J63d0V0_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADop2NFn4TcgQ6+t=OZ1RJqfoZ+_UM8xJJ0zEZWB5Q=U5-_NSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJaLD9KTooyQGPg+sv42ZHrn2=vRSO_Jm26O23wb_J63d0V0_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 03:02:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CADop2NHDSbJPBsqJbW=giWW8f92TGhGbszyeToS4xceq4JN7TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tor-talk@lists.torproject.org" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] are there privacy benefits of running a bridge node?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

yeah I figured.  Just checking.

-V

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Xiaolan.Me <xiaolan65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, bridge is similar an Entry Node...
>
> 2015-01-08 15:43 GMT+08:00 Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>:
>
>> For example, if you run an exit node, your regular traffic is
>> disguised by exit traffic also coming from your ip#.  Is there
>> anything similar for running a bridge node?
>>
>> -V
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

