Delivery-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 23:48:31 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ACF71E049C;
	Sun,  7 Feb 2016 23:48:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0286F3946A;
	Mon,  8 Feb 2016 04:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B8D394BD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 04:48:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id RCs7pEPZGMLP for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  8 Feb 2016 04:48:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472543946A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 04:48:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 580 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at eugeni;
 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 04:48:20 UTC
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004)
 id 3494A2AC6170; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 05:38:37 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1454906317;
 bh=QNBkMGDKwYHvztITsfWL0a29baz3WnoVDJ7sXym2nVY=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=qim3vNFoFSRZTctY5faMiV+nfhwvkdSWGXp5vtKNBpiUZdNavy9sAFpl8xlHKhT0q
 e5uI+6DiM/2NtCOGbAGFMv/Y3mRzLpRFIKEvNfkZq6Tf/FHbjaarb/Z4E2x690rfSK
 MBZb3ijRKlCtfbcKLRJmcnQX8un1FRGtu4h0Gn4c=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (openmailbox-b1 [10.91.69.218])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0112AC6272;
 Mon,  8 Feb 2016 05:38:24 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 04:38:24 +0000
From: bancfc@openmailbox.org
To: whonix-devel@whonix.org
In-Reply-To: <858u2xsa81.fsf@boum.org>
References: <5685200D.4020405@pimienta.org> <568850DD.9010601@whonix.org>
 <858u2xsa81.fsf@boum.org>
Message-ID: <9fbfe389f1b0b7ce616afcebf1c282a4@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: bancfc@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Cc: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org, desktops@secure-os.org,
 The Tails public development discussion list <tails-dev@boum.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Whonix-devel] [Tails-dev] Persistent Tor start in
 Tails vs location aware Tor entry guards (LATEG)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-02-06 23:14, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [can you please decide what mailing-list this discussion should happen
> on, and then we can stop cross-posting over 4 mailing-list?]
> 
[snip]
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the problem you mean to raise, though.
> Can you please elaborate what problem you see if users do exactly this
> ("click through whatever hoops required to make the WiFi connect
> again", which I agree is very likely)?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,


The problems in LATEG/AdvGoalTracking go deep enough that TPO is 
investigating how to solve them in Tor's codebase: 
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-February/010364.html

A wider effort to think about usability of the user facing part of this 
(is any at all) is good too.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

