Delivery-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:15:29 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63BD1E042B;
	Fri,  5 Feb 2016 07:15:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB97D3996E;
	Fri,  5 Feb 2016 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC73994B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id efQ87RGyg22k for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  5 Feb 2016 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1871839927
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f81so126045003iof.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 04:15:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=SFzhYdhd+uirsIMvXhvdrwvU9Xvo/HiXIFFKNY4QUOY=;
 b=vYOYAsrfaPnboP3K1WPywebYtp85NoglrXUYlnX8TGvzLCNjOzqmZ8UoI4iRjO37m/
 yPAu704nBMCIT2pv/TzcfXc8LTlLmdNcZtEPsi+9QWiLO/7cy/WEf0429isHqzwX7xXU
 9UVkXhSVnj5W/huzP2JeF5mCbzxiS/2YeP8VTPPEVb3aXc14gUABHLmd5TNzEhqMKeIz
 pgjnNK/kqp9CWnow6uFx+IOQIFRvf/D/AXI1lGQu8e8nO/3OLlNsvN0SS+icTc25yOkM
 F60Aa/8XBGmVxY78kRa2YXo8Wl4TBYpFWaKlv1gd6bDIp+QhzffyyvhJ8gnAaN9Mn7Zo
 AgwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=SFzhYdhd+uirsIMvXhvdrwvU9Xvo/HiXIFFKNY4QUOY=;
 b=Fe9Jh9p6p6aI3hf7ITDnOd3crOZ4tQYXrOTYcB6Fp7Q7U2/p7SQ3D/MBPxn2s8ErkE
 FdGTGUhdsIkvmtNAHHGVsCfz7ltG+vjmc4wc1etT4FHut2tgibcAJhJF9eEjxQSmxnGL
 l3BVQrzdNfsKkm8r9Kb07xrXVA9bd714sqYanu+fPI1B8ZkDqKCqdVUxXwwE5SjsrQzF
 wISA3rRdjvGhYEFB8/6etaxYcn23vVCmSb9ddTsZ7U0xsKO5saaGkAew0cxbdml41yQc
 0fdqwtDoz5ryMJFODUwi/98vDAZUhDQTg09AJjnevIiHSX9GyoLfPR7VrN2D02ZDvy86
 1H5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQnG3rCse1kb6/6q3Nv556d/MFSeeQpxEsfir8OlpnOBIOERYji+1HSkEzSGDJkmDvWw7k3DS0TT97Cwg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.26.129 with SMTP id a123mr16562991ioa.131.1454674516825; 
 Fri, 05 Feb 2016 04:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.31.170 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 04:15:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3f4f95e6d256e11ed321d1762f1e419f@openmailbox.org>
References: <3f4f95e6d256e11ed321d1762f1e419f@openmailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:15:16 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: edV_shir7RBQ-vMPUK7n-vdke9E
Message-ID: <CAD0dBYUAMAOtwJschFoECVV2+XLnRv4YstpyNpOCR9gXxRoytw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sebastian Niehaus <niehaus@web.de>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Which webmail providers are Tor friendly.
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Try http://mailbox.org. They have an exit node, too. They acccept bitcoin.

2016-02-05 13:09 GMT+01:00  <blobby@openmailbox.org>:
> Hello!
>
> I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones that
> do not insist on SMS verification and do not block Tor.
>
> I used to be happy with openmailbox.org but they now block new sign-ups that
> use Tor.
>
> I like ruggedinbox.com which is very Tor friendly but they are often down
> (DDOS perhaps).
>
> Any other suggestions. I would prefer a basic service. I don't mind paying a
> little if I can use crypto-currency. Although free or a donation model is
> preferred.
>
> Thank you.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk



-- 
--
Sigmentation fault
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

