Delivery-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:50:59 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693051E0B4F;
	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:50:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFF33A037;
	Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEBE39FB1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id eyiREmic8Be8 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321DF39F72
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k196so156514166vka.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:50:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=VYCrUgDNMoCkSjzNfGaYMAEk5iZWp44GRU1oRgQ344c=;
 b=VUL8w+IfxegGscWEtaLa54hbzZpKkbYo8bshgsHnn17fHlC2AgK6s0uks0YSwoglrr
 RIwpZC/UtuEcRdn8sIS5Ou7sfY9hviyOISyBUqZUm0dTv+xwgAH6MaxDh+oNHtsoDscx
 dzO6Q2UzXUTZKxumGVKKlak+QhigosP2sOkdI+6VJdxVociQcupRZXNJaH7EhW1rL/xE
 T/rZcldQ5Sz6q40+QwcSGzcCZmizrbSzE+Q9HDDMvSAsngDSh9QLnZmsIk8xVo7MZzi1
 0SZdEbKTwZcPqHbBafAzT6niRAT6i3UNM2rfTigG4GRlEom3FXeNVMjUZOBa1koG0biV
 hTOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=VYCrUgDNMoCkSjzNfGaYMAEk5iZWp44GRU1oRgQ344c=;
 b=dDkLkzZLzR37KRyf5YifGm/YjL7pLoK0kiL4aIPjuUjalKM2MVpaXUsNnIP4YRgU7/
 7EOXxwL27RZKI/+EhxxdHfLSovCuTCl09Y9bl8uPuvZ8aopzc+OYQc/VrN0HQRBvhwkk
 RcE+IkueknOE/vRG5xtSoQIjmug7vTSP9EUSLRj6FCW7pxF/HUJG4vtbIFoOiAvS95tZ
 eo7N1p/LpVB8jUCrUGpD3NRJnDQZ037tXS9iNR8eDtB/KaLiiIr9cdbFht32V0xenZJI
 Wqh9IcvA1Rm7ZMckC3RmI+E1y0m37HdJlQPMFkACSumHmbmJJtAxys91TOUTqINx4D7C
 G4aQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKCdX47yG1tkTaKJoRlUl97/3SwvOrGWmYVvx0zeBBvJv2lzMbFK9+2ELEEs4R8GIU5a0hP3eS3jCBB6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.108.87 with SMTP id h84mr13730889vkc.156.1456804245814;
 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.176.69.5 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:50:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56D50666.3010609@riseup.net>
References: <A154C659-98B9-4B5A-AE8B-89A67EA8BF78@riseup.net>
 <56C63981.2080604@gmail.com> <56C63AD3.4000002@justaguy.pw>
 <CAD2Ti2-Znf2kCogg_grDqCeWR4FwHERAE1giZgLggoM-6CUFkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5134ABF1-A5A6-45AB-8103-2E85001564D4@riseup.net>
 <20160229231426.GG10235@moria.seul.org>
 <56D50666.3010609@riseup.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:50:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29GfKEfebimNV_8=K0TtYmZ4s4gDQ3aDCNxaeKYH_eebw@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] large increase in .onion domains
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2/29/16, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
> I different question comes to mind: How many .onion domains can Tor
> handle well? Although 80000 represents a large increase, it's a
> minuscule fraction of the ~10^24 namespace. But I'm guessing that
> something would break well before that. Yes?

80000 * size of descriptor mem struct / number of hsdirs = ram per box
plus cpu and bandwidth.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

