Delivery-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:03:20 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1FB1E0B4B;
	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:03:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B6639D55;
	Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:03:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5569B39D37
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id meyGGIoZ7Szw for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC7639D15
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DB51A1D3E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  1 Mar 2016 03:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1456801386; bh=TlFzv4ilnZf0zBVN9LHzgsexVzGkCMrmWO2W2ZxBNWI=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=mBXq4xAOw7b/HIYApy7hCx9W9FnUaCuzvIaVfIonn69NVxuQeYvZDbqZR0OD0ztcw
 wUiSMcV1L62BKHvSf7RMwQ8uvII6gKPlvOSO7xHg0mGa6izQgCz7aWdUOUbWIkerZ2
 sOQWEaijl4LnSnTj8bYLbrnmIk/Hiu4Q3A+tNv7k=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id B2E9F1C0031
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <A154C659-98B9-4B5A-AE8B-89A67EA8BF78@riseup.net>
 <56C63981.2080604@gmail.com> <56C63AD3.4000002@justaguy.pw>
 <CAD2Ti2-Znf2kCogg_grDqCeWR4FwHERAE1giZgLggoM-6CUFkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5134ABF1-A5A6-45AB-8103-2E85001564D4@riseup.net>
 <20160229231426.GG10235@moria.seul.org>
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56D50666.3010609@riseup.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:03:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160229231426.GG10235@moria.seul.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] large increase in .onion domains
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 02/29/2016 04:14 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:01:54PM -0500, Scfith Rise up wrote:
>> Now the spike is up to over 80000 domains. The Tor Project has had more
>> than a few days now to analyze this,
> 
> This is true, but we don't know anything more than we did, and until
> something changes we will continue to not know. My answer from earlier
> still stands:
> "We need to see more improvements in the field of privacy-preserving
> statistics and measurements before we'll feel comfortable trying to get
> answers to this question."

I different question comes to mind: How many .onion domains can Tor
handle well? Although 80000 represents a large increase, it's a
minuscule fraction of the ~10^24 namespace. But I'm guessing that
something would break well before that. Yes?

<SNIP>

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

