Delivery-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:22:45 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY,
	DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF211E0AF7;
	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:22:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA395399B3;
	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7139F90
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KnmzkNtRfmoz for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp9.openmailbox.org (smtp9.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.43])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA37139F89
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004)
 id EE2332AC7E78; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:22:29 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1456773749;
 bh=QAY2OpuAcIJCDc1yrRqG3eT8SqCDWUfn89FyAjBAHQE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=teTfcvCc6DgxoOLBZVbWz/G41nT0nDmiK3dL7KH0qpc2n9dEfj7RimmQTC7I2dzk6
 ywCDDcB+xmSkBSsRSNGoABwEHprGPvm02THOFr3ZRrQHOzPsD+23m+5NZg2pMc694F
 Efg++t2Gz7KgcWzFQjoVdZxkO8RbFGdBTgoFYBtg=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (openmailbox-b1 [10.91.69.218])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63982AC7E6E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:22:29 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:22:29 +0000
From: bancfc@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <2a516b3aef54f51ea82ac4ac45d49a16@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: bancfc@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Subject: [tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

How secure is Lets Encrypt compared to a pinned self signed cert? Can 
Lets Encrypt be subverted by NSLs?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

