Delivery-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:30:28 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173751E008B;
	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:30:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC6639907;
	Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:30:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9539903
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id TYYlwZpGE7HQ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D6239901
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y8so53110104igp.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:30:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=NKqj9QIwR2SC0uV3152aJtujV5zlrDoVRCQxqiqOGEg=;
 b=WbWhu0bn5CoKgF81nZPF62VggDbi85v/AjL9ozoX9eyoATeNIGXF22LKbJtRkZPEsW
 7GqwylaylaWr8PLmsC9zJR0PJQAYrU3gpvTFzV3LCxKf5cKkOc+SoGcLzSMDFdT10DGe
 yhdjPczzi9KPl0NIgPgPh+OXfjpjHt11bvUWPWmeRXO0Vyx8aUm+ao5YYSHJlCiA+p6n
 gIzh9/9wE63G5BmrRSKFizRvdDBGQxXiRejyGYRtNGxpaRbJIgdcFlRE4vuwntp0be9p
 ZGchPZhzLpPWqTt0QAF/xBk7IYkqjf0lVLzJw7nsoQT5jbUpwNu17APjGUEps6dmRah8
 Gacg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=NKqj9QIwR2SC0uV3152aJtujV5zlrDoVRCQxqiqOGEg=;
 b=B3S+3zWaLbQpOtPWotw9vDsdxQamBgc3bf9FzlDzWeIuE7He0EHtDAeeiY2o8VJxLo
 QVI+HXMoDtmXIHg/HsKTqXBEg1UrYtrJQMSecnNbYzZrNJP5VreFUos4FjJeTHj8JeJK
 Sxc4kBV4xMdJbanV9JFPN3UwxywtvexRv++Krl9+kV7WihcQviHl/Z221RO8IjCRWaC3
 8q8C8feDI6JNP6aG0h7viwbN+AeWU2qL/GffKkekKpcYDOM2vReShlAouYuV8Tn7kVgA
 3maVl09u2A4dp5YZKcuZ1WL0BL1H5IUtM/kdq2f0QQEHvGzq7D5+TkyT5eHg2Hc/jmFx
 V+Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQLQtMvVz6tgOKj0/r/UgsQe3KnOxukXky4TKp2Nnd/49IGxHeSBxnj3oZCFsjqKRLSf5PSODJWXHSeQQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.36.105 with SMTP id p9mr563781igj.22.1455942612082; Fri,
 19 Feb 2016 20:30:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.145.70 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:29:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <N1P-pmlB8zKyIG@Safe-mail.net>
References: <N1P-pmlB8zKyIG@Safe-mail.net>
From: Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 05:29:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGRDzQVsSv=+PXD1NHsu2tFYihuVb2rr2oi7BgYUcj=iAEgRgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Fwd: Multiple Internets]
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

ooooo interesting WW - thanks much

F2C2012: Eben Moglen keynote - "Innovation under Austerity"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2VHf5vpBy8

some fucking arrogant shit but some info as well

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:36 AM, <wirelesswarrior@safe-mail.net> wrote:

> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Ted Smith <tedks@riseup.net>
> Apparently from: cypherpunks-bounces@cpunks.org
> To: cypherpunks@cpunks.org
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Multiple Internets]
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:02:57 -0500
>
> >I'm a little skeptical of wireless mesh networks as a general solution
> to this sort of problem, because they're inherently chatty, and have
> very limited reach.
>
> Wireless meshes are usually short range but there is no architectural
> reason they can't be linked by LoS or even longer distances connections.
> One area familiar to hams in the VHF/UHF bands is troposcatter. Tropo is
> similar to the more common HF phenomenon ionospheric reflection ("skip")
> but instead uses refraction changes in lower layers of the atmosphere due
> to temperature/density differences.
>
> Tropo is shorter range (generally 100-500 km) than skip and less RF
> efficient but tends to be more reliable and because it operates using much
> higher frequencies can support much higher bandwidth (data rates). All the
> VHF/UHF ham bands and several unlicensed bands (900 MHz, U.S. only), 2.4
> GHz and 5.7 GHz can all support tropo though reflection efficiency tends to
> be greatest at the lower frequencies.
>
> Until the advent of satellites tropo use was widespread by commercial and
> military. Now that anti-satellite tech is becoming more widespread (e.g.,
> recent Chinese launches) tropo is again being investigated
> http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2013/07/army-troposcatter-communications.html
> I'm considering tropo experiments in one of the ham or ISM bands. Please PM
> if you might have SDR or RF skills, time and some money to throw toward
> this.
>
> Speaking of skip, in my PP Hacker Conference slides
> http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=03580328025747098705 I discuss a
> variant, NVIS (Near Vertical Incident Skywave), first developed by the
> Germans during WW II, which allows HF stations operating between 2 - 12 MHz
> to bounce signals off the ionosphere for intermediate rage (25-100 km)
> non-LoS communications.
>
> WW
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>



-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet@gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

