Delivery-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:15:53 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A450F1E069B;
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:15:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C543961D;
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670B83961A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cdPKqcrH_Sfz for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3069539619
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e6so50599136vkh.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:15:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=nsuchy-top.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=MebJjBHsDCPuNWLPvjYQ1cfH5UsCGNIUBxXDO98hT2Y=;
 b=C+Vu0uSViRBfqRF9e+Q5dXF8rBxG2uHNNcPC5A9RsTNp2gkuRP4M5pDt+7/r+wA2nE
 Dg5A4Cg9CnmZUFYuRO8AHC3Rxr1eiPdY6fdz9ROHvgNjXSh9ORycvXZ13QG0TmIRde11
 UoKqdu0cyZQe1+sGC1uJ0NQUktmTbIIBxN+fvS5OsC4q5dCSKEjUC8t4GNhEhR+XXoC3
 sn9EMGQA5EN4pVrI1ZWiOIjwSVagEl7/zM9cWT9GmFPCUHA0NH5ZWmdpudOe4WTd/FEU
 dtv1N78rJS15r2n8CV+Eqg1ci3ask7Abk6v85Yss51pJxUrmuf8RccT0pS1z7utFLsvG
 FyrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=MebJjBHsDCPuNWLPvjYQ1cfH5UsCGNIUBxXDO98hT2Y=;
 b=h9GC1Haaid+fcbwi770lMRFe/t8iaQtH+jI1ggyzseGizU3K879+E9whoSvOcifuxS
 N8aGFCuTaTWDyXlqFUici+8wRWD048XyUaJ0un94YhgUmhfAs+vD9qY5253aZ9ruzCYw
 heIRIHSI/T4cmQgq4zwSMJWYRtqmfxR7Yefof0RKlSlANp4ufqxh7weali5i0YB0lIG5
 lvY1WQzXGqXPl1QOdFfaBsU6mOmd70Czn4a8qqMRBEYihS53wWFFDxfuZr5dhAtUncnI
 oPhB2bG/188IOITzv2S6XHRWjvsBkfVJnnTAbHPwIgzaLRLH4rhSzDP/ms9/oQ1LXPLW
 QhLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT0h20LioJtCRx688faNWxTQhiQjbtR71kDYuiWhNn6uX0LIM2IkUy73PGP8jCJ2V9/xyf9cdNXqtET1fH7
X-Received: by 10.31.166.208 with SMTP id p199mr7140323vke.122.1455815740519; 
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:15:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A154C659-98B9-4B5A-AE8B-89A67EA8BF78@riseup.net>
 <20160218102232.GF522@riseup.net>
 <1455791363286-17a6f558-170f335c-e09f3707@cryptolab.net>
 <B1DF85FA-1505-4531-AE74-9F573E654CBA@riseup.net>
 <20160218155107.GA10235@moria.seul.org>
 <CAL3oi7bZxA1T0Kyqgg3eJ_RjxgLt9dV8Ciu90OXMXKX3L=cfLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL3oi7bZxA1T0Kyqgg3eJ_RjxgLt9dV8Ciu90OXMXKX3L=cfLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nathaniel Suchy <admin@nsuchy.top>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:15:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD--ZDWjv73D9WDPXizYeb6G5wgaVhoU3_oLtF5+LpW_rsLjnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tor Talk <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] large increase in .onion domains
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Could new people be using Onionchat/Torchat I can't remember the name. But
new addresses are generated for each client.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:49 AM Alexandre Guillioud <
guillioud.alexandre@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not correlated (i'm too small in that pool), but i have workd on software
> to maintain a HS pool. During dev, and at one point, i was emitting
> thousands of registration a day.
>
> 2016-02-18 16:51 GMT+01:00 Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:45:26AM -0500, Scfith Rise up wrote:
> > > Here is the exact link:
> > https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-dir-onions-seen.html
> > >
> > > it jumped from 40000 to 60000 in the past day or two.
> > >
> > > Since the metrics are based on the number of relays acting as hidden
> > >services with the assumption that at least 1% are reporting in, the
> > >numbers are correlated directly with the number of relays running as
> well.
> >
> > Yep. Also, because each reporting relay adds noise, sometimes, due to
> > the math involved, more than half of the relays end up inflating their
> > number, so we end up with a higher number on that graph than is actually
> > true in reality.
> >
> > Still, that is a large jump.
> >
> > Let's wait a few days and see if it settles down.
> >
> > If it doesn't, I'll guess that it's a real effect. But even then,
> > we don't know why this (daily!) number is so much larger than the
> > (total!) number of onion addresses that e.g. Ahmia knows about. Maybe
> > it's Onionshare users, who generate one onion address per document they
> > transfer? Maybe it's Ricochet users? Maybe it's measurement error? We
> need
> > to see more improvements in the field of privacy-preserving statistics
> > and measurements before we'll feel comfortable trying to get answers to
> > this question.
> >
> > --Roger
> >
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> >
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

