Delivery-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:49:37 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACBBD1E0692;
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:49:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C2C395DD;
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59611395CA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:49:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 5UDvPyCDiyFs for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:49:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121E339587
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id g62so33896210wme.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:49:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
 :subject:to:content-type;
 bh=ribxZM8ohPFIJjdbSoX0TrWEnAAmUwjoU0A/AzPgbOo=;
 b=RFLI0Uw4kCG1G/VRwB+gLRU/BpipH5/jZQsmdRD03yjxoiqhyXERMMhI3cq3eqCfke
 z7wbaSJvh056I3mp2FWzJdiuH2yEQZPh7ulp3xuL57Ij4N1JcEk482vRDdoEN62a1Epx
 8v20JxtxRCHnMgIL/Vr2FAEhc02tFokCMqgI49qKctsAxvMLZXxzWTpdfvU46Q1tIBw5
 pAREzdYexwoVEGM1yoHcZbaVW83+dn6hh46vkNoWpYalmJFwNmpnx4rb3XjXBYHVUQRG
 Tvd27QESGwTwciZNjVgSOWigySVQrF6T0aYYzGgLZCmUWmTtrhFQKLLy9bvfgJGF70Le
 lRAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
 :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=ribxZM8ohPFIJjdbSoX0TrWEnAAmUwjoU0A/AzPgbOo=;
 b=RaTQPyJqQb7gQM4+z6iSyc0RdNTyZqbcBipkdPq/qHHBo8JZDZbYqShrixQrtVilCP
 vgDFVBFFnxbWek6Yg8Hd7YpT76dKwZBfL9vQ22GppIM6Y6sfAEs1quICtF1c6RSOw9qG
 bIZJX4eIsi3+b5oSQ1uzF0hPyUICRe9Qxon0Ol77He/i95DR6LOSzK72TnKdRfADq7jM
 byEiQvODlKDT1wcGpsA5zzjjL41UbXjWYp24uD1dDxxJBJ+5BqH5j6+3kKnrYhMTb0Kg
 ILluP1mvUcdZikTfQeN8HPC6huZt+dHxYvWA4vVLSoFkaq4HLwkLyweCBgnsUX3jhgYn
 SCYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTiCIqv3ncQuXToYPDD+mpiXb5xbAk5iG06hZy4TqTjFlWz1A36rDbX/IMXdcEXqWHIsYP/ScxBurTGDw==
X-Received: by 10.194.61.240 with SMTP id t16mr8538105wjr.27.1455814161172;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:49:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.89.5 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:49:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160218155107.GA10235@moria.seul.org>
References: <A154C659-98B9-4B5A-AE8B-89A67EA8BF78@riseup.net>
 <20160218102232.GF522@riseup.net>
 <1455791363286-17a6f558-170f335c-e09f3707@cryptolab.net>
 <B1DF85FA-1505-4531-AE74-9F573E654CBA@riseup.net>
 <20160218155107.GA10235@moria.seul.org>
From: Alexandre Guillioud <guillioud.alexandre@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:49:01 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4O2fmKs83lnm99SDcpUHQcGJ9ww
Message-ID: <CAL3oi7bZxA1T0Kyqgg3eJ_RjxgLt9dV8Ciu90OXMXKX3L=cfLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tor Talk <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] large increase in .onion domains
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Not correlated (i'm too small in that pool), but i have workd on software
to maintain a HS pool. During dev, and at one point, i was emitting
thousands of registration a day.

2016-02-18 16:51 GMT+01:00 Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:45:26AM -0500, Scfith Rise up wrote:
> > Here is the exact link:
> https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-dir-onions-seen.html
> >
> > it jumped from 40000 to 60000 in the past day or two.
> >
> > Since the metrics are based on the number of relays acting as hidden
> >services with the assumption that at least 1% are reporting in, the
> >numbers are correlated directly with the number of relays running as well.
>
> Yep. Also, because each reporting relay adds noise, sometimes, due to
> the math involved, more than half of the relays end up inflating their
> number, so we end up with a higher number on that graph than is actually
> true in reality.
>
> Still, that is a large jump.
>
> Let's wait a few days and see if it settles down.
>
> If it doesn't, I'll guess that it's a real effect. But even then,
> we don't know why this (daily!) number is so much larger than the
> (total!) number of onion addresses that e.g. Ahmia knows about. Maybe
> it's Onionshare users, who generate one onion address per document they
> transfer? Maybe it's Ricochet users? Maybe it's measurement error? We need
> to see more improvements in the field of privacy-preserving statistics
> and measurements before we'll feel comfortable trying to get answers to
> this question.
>
> --Roger
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

