Delivery-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:04:24 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B841E093A;
	Tue,  2 Feb 2016 02:04:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB7439472;
	Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353D039360
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Svertg00R4hv for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from meiko.romanrm.net (meiko.romanrm.net
 [IPv6:2001:bc8:3829:100::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08ADC3933C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from natsu (unknown [IPv6:fd39::e9:9eff:fe8f:1bcf])
 by meiko.romanrm.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 30C8510DEDE;
 Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:03:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:03:39 +0500
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Green Dream <greendream848@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160202120339.48d98cc8@natsu>
In-Reply-To: <CAAd2PDKPXNDXjoPM-Vri8GSzRxhQRMyVnUTR2074oqSL8-qrwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <56ADFF9F.6010507@openmailbox.org>
 <CAAd2PDKPXNDXjoPM-Vri8GSzRxhQRMyVnUTR2074oqSL8-qrwQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] 4 relays advertising >1000 MByte/s each
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8209271935648156328=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

--===============8209271935648156328==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/DFqI+Gvyg0qD.B1I6C1iel="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--Sig_/DFqI+Gvyg0qD.B1I6C1iel=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:47:30 -0800
Green Dream <greendream848@gmail.com> wrote:

> I still don't understand how such relays can gain a high consensus weight
> so quickly (in 1 or 2 days) without help from the bandwidth authorities.

Don't worry, just another sting operation to capture someone's traffic (by
directing them to relays which have behind the scenes unfairly inflated CW).
This will be explained away in a few days as "whooops, another "researcher"
messed up, nothing to see here guys".

Seriously, if this is not what we should assume, then what? Remember, some
people possibly put their lives on line by trusting the Tor project, and wi=
th
this kind of trust involved, how in your right mind you think Tor should be
given a free pass with mysterious "anomalies" like these from time to time?

--=20
With respect,
Roman

--Sig_/DFqI+Gvyg0qD.B1I6C1iel=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlawVMsACgkQTLKSvz+PZwh7fQCeKJ0ciFLZTZMWB9UpFB3XQrBJ
MsAAn1XqLgHNzuIr0Q2uhirOnFXnjSpu
=U+kB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/DFqI+Gvyg0qD.B1I6C1iel=--

--===============8209271935648156328==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============8209271935648156328==--

