Delivery-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:08:46 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9751E0DC0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 17:08:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F6733599;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2015 22:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCE93358D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 22:08:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NTrscsLNgwNA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  2 Feb 2015 22:08:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 042DD3358C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 22:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lnx9i-1XlGjp37pw-00g1oi for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:29:45 +0100
Message-ID: <54CFEC44.5020502@gmx.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:29:40 -0600
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <54CB577A.9000100@riseup.net> <54CD1B02.70304@whonix.org>
 <54CD85A8.6080601@riseup.net> <op.xtc9exdbbgbjo9@work-pc.lan>
 <54CDD77E.6010700@riseup.net> <54CDFBBC.5080909@techwang.com>
 <54CE4461.4020106@gmx.com>
 <CAOsGNSSwroT9Wz0bPE7Zseh=c2BrnmEUXh_0GGN0qZf91JR6Rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <54CEB232.4080703@gmx.com>
 <CAOsGNSSk0zx-Za+zjpW_nwsYWKCERp0CMnhG2eZnWEDqjFExYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOsGNSSk0zx-Za+zjpW_nwsYWKCERp0CMnhG2eZnWEDqjFExYA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:RtnC6O8Z2qiCwGaLW17yxj4BJ9IR/94qNtaH/ZQIDseRx5QkRdB
 CzgiSNpUWMvwhEw91lzQ8xqTjoZ/d8RpOpeVFpDT30F1Tgw3xLs3I9RyDuDpUVJapMKjog6
 cOzCXecGNea1fIF1fo5GZeAyt38QgGwYHN0GGIAxRohebNIT6sNzxNdq6qGe35jROliuRhY
 Mgpd7Us4PVmG3+wMf25tQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor -> VPN Clarification
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Thanks again.

On 2/1/2015 6:09 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If you don't feel competent setting up sshd and ssh tunneling say, or
> managing the security updates for your own virtual private server, or
> customizing your firewall and TOR configuration so you are certain
> about what's travelling through what and across what, then yes, you
> are likely to shoot yourself in the foot and is *better to just use TBB
> or whonix/ tails etc.*
 >> Do you mean (or also mean), "better to just use TBB AND whonix / Tails?"

> ...there's no simple way to say "just do this
> extra step and get extra privacy or anonymity or safety" - if there
> were, it would be in the Tor FAQ, which you have read haven't you?
 >> Yes, read them - several times.  Won't hurt to re-read.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

