Delivery-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:56:24 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DAAB1E0BB2
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 13:56:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79F1334B4;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C61333C9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id TuR2wwcAc-N5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0DD33365
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9022025BA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 19:56:13 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=user-agent:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :mime-version:received:received; s=openmailbox; t=1422903371;
 bh=uO1YlVZKLWdJVZotO9WI1PWSPkdOD59TrwrjVVXtZbs=; b=XvF0xbfo35LE
 u9IogeD8wyms+J3zq0trswtQC7+G4j+1WAvZ7wVdQcHBbZCXKsz8ZRNdtPPXNcc7
 2ZbU51Z4KgPAUA5AD1R9PjXzv+nNYxESvcGNZ62w8W2U5rCvkWDl2/bW8BhjaFFj
 ef7oKJY/wFJrisaoxBYS6QHGlqDzbNE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sV4qdf_ydSDg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  2 Feb 2015 19:56:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F80200022
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 19:56:11 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:56:11 -0800
From: spencerone@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <3f950ce00a56f20a6f1f84d74c97d8f3@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5
Subject: [tor-talk] ATOMIC BANJO and LEVITATION used by CSE
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Paul Syverson paul.syverson at nrl.navy.mil:
> See p. 129 of http://www.acsac.org/2011/program/keynotes/syverson.pdf
> also
> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#WhyCalledTor
> 
> aloha,
> Paul
> 
> (Note, the German meaning of 'Tor' mentioned in the FAQ is discussed in 
> the "A Peel of Onion"
> paper, the Turkish meaning is apparently a fine-meshed net.)

Awesome, that kinda makes sense, tough, given that Tor is THE onion 
router, I think referring to Tor as TOR is still accurate :)

Besides, I never read FAQ sections, it is fragmented IA, as I shouldn't 
have any questions after reading everything else, which, in the case of 
torproject.org, could be less.

Also, thanks for the note, I wasn't able to get past the server time-out 
at: http://www.acsac.org/2011/program/keynotes/syverson.pdf :)



Griffin Boyce griffin at cryptolab.net:
> It also wouldn't be very fair to call it TOR as there's more than one
> onion routing project out there ;-)
> 
> ~Griffin

I can get on board with this logic.  Tor it is :)

Thanks guys!



Wordlife,
SpencerOne

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

