Delivery-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:03:51 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD031E0A33
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 12:03:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0296B334E0;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2015 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B86334D9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id MyOMq3XB_50n for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  2 Feb 2015 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.214.179])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5034D334D6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wp4so3600238obc.10
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:03:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=mcwLG79T+cltvynqe4YJkaTJe6knd/GasFlAjlPuZjI=;
 b=d1echY+OulO753YaQpCl8XTcTwZUNMttOWgEQXIBuKC+OWbf9O9yUheUbX1x67/opt
 YkkaHSfGskh5w2tOZYXRXIxks+mSC9+GDD/RjUzOPl/1t6QAz8B2P/ypfS6nAEYOMpSA
 tFSqfs39Qcm/uTl4tS7DJ8/5N3o6RUkei+OV0473zIRmQDkfDUoR7Xcq8SL1qquiqFVo
 xQrr5Ho/vjm2Y8RVC21+O1pvCzpjnuG7IcLaxczoa848a87rdDFO7Ckru7HxBn6uDgGe
 dW/lZ5aTMHNmx1nN1TwEa0eibYnmnUHVagn6r4us4lGPLlrclU31+txx5qGSqBDnV6AW
 1QaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkg4dGIJpqHk/+hHyQcnbQduVIr+VqGbvg/pm07tzwDux9aouQyzU8tgQ6SelUbQ65ZLqJr
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.28.100 with SMTP id a4mr12690045obh.69.1422896620841;
 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:03:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.24.136 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:03:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [31.50.214.83]
In-Reply-To: <20150202150747.130FBC0372@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <54CF0953.4040504@cni.net>
 <20150202150747.130FBC0372@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:03:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CABMkiz4CFuH_ZkgckCpKVyu9v3F1BU6kJcqYW+d+_+a-R0uTxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Tasker <ben@bentasker.co.uk>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] ISP CenturyLink Blocking Tor?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Leeroy - I think what he meant was that if anyone can actually get through
to someone to talk to (and get a response) - as opposed to breaching a real
firewall and leaking staff details, at least that's the way I read it.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, l.m <ter.one.leeboi@hush.com> wrote:

>
> "Larry Brandt" wrote:
> If anyone can penetrate their personnel firewall, please
> disclose to this group.  In most on my dealings, CenturyLink was too
> under-employed to respond to my requests.
>
> The problem hasn't even been confirmed as censorship of Tor and you
> want to dox them publically using Tor-talk. Is that what you think
> Tor-talk is for? Yes of course lets all get right on that for you--so
> we can attack their privacy the way they may (or may not) be attacking
> their client's? Wrong list. Wrong way of looking at this.
>
> --leeroy
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>



-- 
Ben Tasker
https://www.bentasker.co.uk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

